You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I checked the next branch to see if the feature has already been implemented
I searched existing reports to see if it is already requested.
What is the user problem or growth opportunity you want to see solved?
In the rofi script, after filtering and selecting/keybind pressing, the only way I see to keep the filter is to restart rofi with the -filter option. Which is not even a complete solution to the problem, since there is also nowhere to get the value for the filter.
How do you know that this problem exists today? Why is this important?
This limits me and I do not have enough competences to implement it, that is why I am opening this report.
Who will benefit from it?
Me and possibly other rofi scripts authors.
Rofi version (rofi -v)
Version: 1.7.5
Configuration
Additional information
The intuitive way in my opinion is to have a mode option filter, by analogy with prompt, message etc., and then it would be convenient to take the value for the filter from the environment variable ROFI_INPUT.
A more straightforward way to do the above is the keep-filter mode option, by analogy with keep-selection, but I guess it less straightforward to implement.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Before opening a feature request
What is the user problem or growth opportunity you want to see solved?
In the rofi script, after filtering and selecting/keybind pressing, the only way I see to keep the filter is to restart rofi with the
-filter
option. Which is not even a complete solution to the problem, since there is also nowhere to get the value for the filter.How do you know that this problem exists today? Why is this important?
This limits me and I do not have enough competences to implement it, that is why I am opening this report.
Who will benefit from it?
Me and possibly other rofi scripts authors.
Rofi version (rofi -v)
Version: 1.7.5
Configuration
Additional information
The intuitive way in my opinion is to have a mode option
filter
, by analogy withprompt
,message
etc., and then it would be convenient to take the value for the filter from the environment variableROFI_INPUT
.A more straightforward way to do the above is the
keep-filter
mode option, by analogy withkeep-selection
, but I guess it less straightforward to implement.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: