You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apologies for having a very vague request but I hope it makes sense.
Some Fallout tests are run against different backends, configurations, but the configuration itself may exist outside of Fallout. For example, service running in a test cluster may be differently configured across test runs, but there is no indication in Fallout results as Fallout configuration or test was not changed.
Or even if settings were changed, finding related settings may require lots of knowledge about test case internals.
If there was a way to add some sort of free-desc snippet ("annotation" or whatever it is called) to include in test artifacts / HTML, this would allow an easy way to add relevant contextual information for anyone reading the results.
I was thinking of a simple text box, to be passed as argument through test start call, to be passed along with test configuration. But I have no idea how feasible this would be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Apologies for having a very vague request but I hope it makes sense.
Some Fallout tests are run against different backends, configurations, but the configuration itself may exist outside of Fallout. For example, service running in a test cluster may be differently configured across test runs, but there is no indication in Fallout results as Fallout configuration or test was not changed.
Or even if settings were changed, finding related settings may require lots of knowledge about test case internals.
If there was a way to add some sort of free-desc snippet ("annotation" or whatever it is called) to include in test artifacts / HTML, this would allow an easy way to add relevant contextual information for anyone reading the results.
I was thinking of a simple text box, to be passed as argument through test start call, to be passed along with test configuration. But I have no idea how feasible this would be.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: