Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How does this compare to Kubeflow? #61

Open
suryaavala opened this issue Aug 4, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

How does this compare to Kubeflow? #61

suryaavala opened this issue Aug 4, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@suryaavala
Copy link

I am not trying to contest this project, genuinely want to understand the reasoning/philosophy behind doing something from scratch when there are much more (relatively) mature alternatives like Kubeflow, which seem to do very similar things.

It would be great if the maintainers of OpenMLOps could compare it with Kubeflow and other alternatives and shine some light on the philosophy of this one.

I reckon it would be helpful for people to make more informed decisions :)

@sixhobbits
Copy link
Collaborator

hey @suryaavala, great question. In the initial version we actually did use Kubeflow, but we found it problematic in several ways. You can read about it here https://datarevenue.com/en-blog/kubeflow-not-ready-for-production.

TL;DR - kubeflow tries to do it all in one system, and we think doesn't get everything right quite yet (but we are following progress pretty closely). For now, we think a more flexible and modular approach is better in a lot of cases, but you are right that we should add a detailed comparison :)

@offchan42
Copy link

Have you guys tried ClearML? What's your opinion?

@mik3githubber
Copy link

Have you guys taken a look at Kubeflow 1.3? That version seems to have resolved many complaints.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants