Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The Agent:hasAddress should not be a blank node? #96

Open
lecoqlibre opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

The Agent:hasAddress should not be a blank node? #96

lecoqlibre opened this issue Oct 26, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@simonLouvet
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@lecoqlibre
Copy link
Member

According to the ontology, an Address can be used by many Agent. Does that mean that such an address should be a dedicated object so it can be referenced by multiple Agent? If so, the Agent:hasAddress should be a reference to an object in the JSON-LD. However, in the 1.7 example, the Person:hasAddress is a blank node.
@lecoqlibre lecoqlibre added the question Further information is requested label Oct 26, 2022
@simonLouvet
Copy link
Contributor

the ontology mention one to many and a agree adress have to be a plain semantic subject and not a blank node

@simonLouvet simonLouvet added bug Something isn't working and removed question Further information is requested labels Oct 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@simonLouvet simonLouvet

Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lecoqlibre @simonLouvet