You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The connector is not allowing assignment of top concepts within Taxononies (specifically Product Type, may apply to other taxons).
Given the sparse nature of the DFC Taxonomies, I had assumed (and I think agreed with Florence) that we would default up to a level that worked. For example: a Plum tomato, would default up to "Tomato" as there is no subclass for Plum Tomatoes. or a Loquat would default to Fruit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is blocking OFN, as we can't use any level of Product Type but the narrowest one. Ie :
we can't use Drink -> Soft Drink, modelled as a DataFoodConsortium::Connector::SKOSInstance in the connector
we can only use the most specific one Drink -> Soft Drink -> Lemonade, modelled as a DataFoodConsortium::Connector::SKOSConcept in the connector
Ideally all levels of Product Type should be modelled as DataFoodConsortium::Connector::SKOSConcept. Also none of the SKOSConcept property are set: broaders, schemes, narrowers and prefLabels. This makes it really difficult to try and match OFN taxonomies with DFC Product Types, as there is no easy way to traverse the Product Type tree.
The connector is not allowing assignment of top concepts within Taxononies (specifically Product Type, may apply to other taxons).
Given the sparse nature of the DFC Taxonomies, I had assumed (and I think agreed with Florence) that we would default up to a level that worked. For example: a Plum tomato, would default up to "Tomato" as there is no subclass for Plum Tomatoes. or a Loquat would default to Fruit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: