Add explicit support for RAiD to relatedIdentifier #167
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
|
Thanks for submitting this suggestion, @mpfl! Out of curiosity, I took a look at whether RAiDs are already being used in RelatedIdentifier. I was surprised to see they are mostly(?) being provided with relatedIdentifierType="DOI": https://api.datacite.org/dois?query=relatedIdentifiers.relatedIdentifier:*raid* For example: {
"relationType": "IsPartOf",
"relatedIdentifier": "https://raid.org/10.71821/418be95a",
"resourceTypeGeneral": "Project",
"relatedIdentifierType": "DOI"
} |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We've started to formally define this and welcome feedback here: Request for comment: New relatedIdentifierType "RAiD" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This could be closed: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This has been integrated with the recent release of DataCite Metadata Schema 4.7, which adds a relatedIdentifierType "RAiD". Find more information about the release here: https://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-4.7/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What is the problem that your suggestion solves?
At the moment, a RAiD can only be used in relatedIdentifier as a generic URL.
Although DataCite DOIs are used to underpin the stability and persistence of RAiDs, the DOI that is minted as a part of the RAiD minting process should never be used in place of the actual RAiD.
Furthermore, with the release of ISO 26324:2025, a DOI should not be used in place of a RAiD:
"A DOI name shall not be used as a replacement for other ISO identifier schemes such as ISAN (ISO 15706-1 and ISO 15706-2), ISBN (ISO 2108), ISRC (ISO 3901), ISSN (ISO 3297), ISNI (ISO 27729), ISWC (ISO 15707), ISCI (ISO 27730), ISMN (ISO 10957), RAiD (ISO 23527) and other commonly recognized identifiers."
What solution might meet your needs?
Add RAiD to the relatedIdentifierType list.
Your name
Matthias Liffers
Your organization
Australian Research Data Commons
What alternatives have you tried or considered?
No response
Is there anything else you would like to share?
No response
What group(s) would benefit from your suggestion?
If other group(s), please describe.
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions