Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare coala+gitmate with danger #65

Open
jayvdb opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Compare coala+gitmate with danger #65

jayvdb opened this issue Jan 5, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@jayvdb
Copy link
Member

jayvdb commented Jan 5, 2017

danger includes process and code quality automation, integrated with GitHub and other code repository systems.

An example of process automation is requiring PR authors join the organisation.

coala only provides code quality automation with the addition of git commit message checking.
gitmate adds GitHub integration.

coala+gitmate lacks process automation, and is not especially interested in pursuing that goal.

However coala+gitmate does expect to be better at code quality automation than danger.
A comparison on this wiki would be useful to ensure that coala developers acknowledge where open source competitors in this space, like dangar, are out performing coala.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants