You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current working groups process only mentions working groups at the broader "TOC level". Today, we have a lot of WGs spread across TAGs but they are not documented in the TOC repo. It is very hard to find info about what WGs exist.
The whole process needs to be revamped as part of cncf#1158.
There was some work that was started as part of cncf#868,
but the PR has languished.
This PR keeps the existing process and defines a lightweight process for
creation of new WGs in a TAG. This mirrors the process we follow today.
Signed-off-by: Nikhita Raghunath <[email protected]>
The whole process needs to be revamped as part of cncf#1158.
There was some work that was started as part of cncf#868,
but the PR has languished.
This PR keeps the existing process and defines a lightweight process for
creation of new WGs in a TAG. This mirrors the process we follow today.
Signed-off-by: Nikhita Raghunath <[email protected]>
The current working groups process only mentions working groups at the broader "TOC level". Today, we have a lot of WGs spread across TAGs but they are not documented in the TOC repo. It is very hard to find info about what WGs exist.
We should:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: