Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Crunchbase requirement is too strict #767

Closed
nicorikken opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Crunchbase requirement is too strict #767

nicorikken opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@nicorikken
Copy link

I'm trying to add pandapower to the LFEnergy landscape (pull request: lf-energy/lfenergy-landscape#293). As the majority of the code is developed in tandem between the University of Kassel and Fraunhofer Institute for for Energy Economics
and Energy System Technology (IEE) Kassel
, there is no single entity to attribute in the Crunchbase field. I tried leaving it out or leaving it empty, but that fails. I can provide a single entry, but that doesn't do justice to the other party.

I believing making this field mandatory and single-entry is a mistake that needs to be addressed. I think the most pragmatic solution is to allow omitting the field or setting an explicit None value.

@caniszczyk
Copy link

caniszczyk commented Aug 31, 2021 via email

@jordinl
Copy link
Contributor

jordinl commented Aug 31, 2021

@nicorikken instead of having to add a crunchbase entry you can use

organization:
  name: Some organization in tandem with some other organization

@nicorikken
Copy link
Author

Thanks @jordinl83 that worked!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants