A new Pull Request was created by @shimashimarin (Jie Xiao) for branch IB/CMSSW_10_6_X/gcc700.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.
cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Update sherpa to 2.2.15 #8450

please test

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ba366b/34628/summary.html
COMMIT: 85a7e40
CMSSW: CMSSW_10_6_X_2023-09-03-0000/slc7_amd64_gcc700
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmsdist/8681/34628/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 5 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3215686
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3215351
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 334
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 34 files compared)
• Checked 144 log files, 103 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

backport of #8450

+externals

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_10_6_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

assign generators

@rappoccio @antoniovilela feel free to merge it for 10.6.X

New categories assigned: generators

@mkirsano,@menglu21,@alberto-sanchez,@SiewYan,@GurpreetSinghChahal,@Saptaparna you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

+1

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_10_6_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio @antoniovilela feel free to merge it for 10.6.X and incldue it in next 10.6 release

+1

Would it be possible to have a new release with this?

Would it be possible to have a new release with this?

Yes.