Skip to content

Add support for aggregating all inbound data before calling server Ring handler #692

Open
@KingMob

Description

@KingMob

About

The official Ring spec states that the body of a request should be an InputStream, and Aleph complies with this (when not in raw mode).

However, InputStreams aren't always desirable, because they're a blocking interface.

If no data is available (and you haven't reached EOS), any read calls will block. Block on enough of these in your Ring handlers, and you can run out of threads/resources. This limitation propagates to many common transformations of your InputStream, including slurp and bs/to-string.

One way around this is to let Aleph/Netty accumulate all the body ByteBufs before calling the user handler with the Ring request map. Netty won't consume extra threads for this, though of course, memory will be consumed.

Aggregation currently happens automatically if you set the max-request-body-size option, but that's an implementation detail. This issue aims to be more explicit.

Proposal

Add an option like aggregate-data?, wait-for-body-to-finish?, or whatever, which adds aggregation. For HTTP1, it would be the HttpObjectAggregator. For HTTP2, it'll use the custom aggregator used for the body size limit.

While we shouldn't always force a size limit, we must still apply some limits, or a trivial DoS attack will be to send an infinite stream to a server, and force it to consume all memory.

We can either apply a size limit, a time limit, or both. If the aggregation option is set, so must one of the limit options. We can
stick with max-request-body-size, but we should probably add a new one for a time limit. Maybe max-request-time or max-execution-time. We already have a bunch of timeouts on the client side, like request-timeout and read-timeout, maybe we should call it read-timeout for consistency.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions