synthetic_data_openai.json

[{"gt_context": "O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 Technical Specification \t\t Copyright \u00a9 2023 by the O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V. The copying or incorporation into any other work of part or all of the material available in this specification in any form without the prior written permission of O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V. is prohibited, save that you may print or download extracts of the material of this specification for your personal use, or copy the material of this specification for the purpose of sending to individual third parties for their information provided that you acknowledge O-RAN ALLIANCE as the source of the material and that you inform the third party that these conditions apply to them and that they must comply with them. O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V., Buschkauler Weg 27, 53347 Alfter, Germany O-RAN Working Group 4 (Fronthaul Working Group) Conformance Test Specification \t Revision History Date Revision Description 2020.06.02 01.00 Final Version 01.00 2020.10.25 01.00.01 Integrate VIA-0001, KEY-0003, VIA-0002, KEY-0008 2020.10.25 01.00.02 Integrate, KEY-0006 2020.11.01 01.00.03 Integrate KEY-0011, KEY-0004, KEY-0005, SPL-0001 2020.11.02 01.00.04 Integrate KEY-0007, KEY-0009, VIA.RDS-0001 2020.11.06 02.00 Address all review comments and finalize release 2021.02.04 02.00.06 Include approved CRs versions 02.00.01-02.00.06: INT-0009, FJT-0002, RNS-0001, VIA-0003 KEY-0010, KEY-0013, DCM-0009, KEY-0014, NEC-0007, NEC-0008, VIA-0004, KEY-0015, KEY-0016, KEY-RNS-0019, KEY-0017, KEY-0018 and add new test cases to the clause 1.2.4 Test Requirement Status table 2021.03.01 02.00.07 Fix missing changes 2 and 3 of CR DCM-0009 and included FJT-0003, NEC-0008. 2021.03.05 03.00.00 All comments addressed and finalized 2021.05.31 03.00.01 Included approved CRs: FJT-0004, XLX-0001, KEY-0019, KEY-0020, KEY-0021, KEY-0022, KEY-0023, KEY-0025 2021.06.23 03.00.02 Included approved CRs: KEY-0024, KEY-0026, KEY-0027, KEY-0028, NVI-0101, RNS-0002, RNS-0003, RNS-0004, RNS-0005 2021.07.11 04.00.00 Final version 4 incorporatingall comments received after version 03.00.02 2022.03.08 04.00.01 Includes initial typographical and similar corrections from the review spreadsheet and approved CRs RNS-0006, FJT-0005, RNS-0008, RNS-0009, KEY-0029 KEY-0030 NEC-0013, FJT-0008, KEY-0031, KEY-0032, FJT-0009, FJT-0010, KEY-0030, KEY-0033 2022.03.15 04.00.02 Includes RNS-0010, FJT-0010 v4, KEY.CMC-0034, comments register items 1-33 2022.03.20 04.00.03 Includes changes to address comments from FJT and NOK from Comments-Register-CONF-v05.00-r6.xlsx 2022.03.24 05.00 Include comments up to and including comment 56 in the comments register version 8. 2022.07.14 05.00.01 Include CRs KEY-CMCC-0002, KEY-0037, VIA-0005, CAL-0001, VIA-0006, VIA-0007, CAL-0003 and comments register items 1-6 2022.07.14 05.00.02 Include CRs FJT-0013, NEC-0015, EC-0016, NEC-0017, FJ-0014, RNS-0011, RNS-0012 and comments register items 7-18 2022.07.15 05.00.03 Include comments register items 19-60 2022.07.19 06.00 Include comments 61-63 and update to version 06.00 2022.10.30 06.00.01 Include CRs CAL-0002-r4, KEY-CUC-0001-r4, FJT-0015-r2, FJT-0016, FJT-0017, KEY-0039 2022.11.03 06.00.02 Include CRs KEY-0040, FJT-0018, VIA-0011 and all comments 2022.11.12 07.00 Final draft review comments included 2023.02.26 07.00.01 Include CRs FJT-0019, FJT-0020, CAL-0004, KEY-0041, KEY-0042, KEY-0043, CAL-0005, KEY-0044, APOP-0003, APOP-0004, FJT-0021 2023.03.05 07.00.02 KEY-0044-R2, Review comments 1-42 2023.03.12 08.00 Final review comments 2023.07.13 08.00.01 Include CRs KEY-0045, KEY-0046, KEY-0047, CAL-0006, NOK-0136, KEY-0048, FJT-0027, FJT-0028, FJT-0029, FJT-0030, CAL-0007, CAL-0008 2023.07.17 08.00.02 Update with comments spreadsheet 2023.07.19 09.00 Update with comments spreadsheet version 6 Table of Contents Revision History\t2 1\tIntroductory Material\t7 1.1\tForeword\t7 1.2\tScope\t7 1.2.1\tGeneral\t7 1.2.2\tU-Plane and C-Plane Scope\t7 1.2.3\tS-Plane\t7 1.2.4\tTest Requirement Status\t8 1.3\tReferences\t20 1.4\tDefinitions\t21 1.5\tAbbreviations\t22 2\tTest Configuration\t23 2.1\tTest Configuration for O-RU as the Device Under Test\t23 2.2\tTest Configuration for O-DU as the Device Under Test\t24 2.3\tTest Configuration for Shared Cell Configurations\t25 2.3.1\tTest Configuration for FHM as the Device Under Test\t25 3\tConformance Measurements\t26 3.1\tM-Plane Measurements\t26 3.1.1\tTransport and Handshake Test Scenarios\t26 3.1.1.1\tTransport and Handshake in IPv4/SSH Environment (positive case)\t26 3.1.1.2\tTransport and Handshake in IPv4/SSH Environment (negative case)\t28 3.1.1.3\tTransport and Handshake in IPv6/SSH Environment (positive case)\t29 3.1.1.4\tTransport and Handshake in IPv6/SSH Environment (negative case)\t29 3.1.1.5\tTransport and Handshake in IPv4/TLS Environment (positive case)\t29 3.1.1.6\tTransport and Handshake in IPv4/TLS Environment (negative case)\t29 3.1.1.7\tTransport and Handshake in IPv6/TLS Environment (positive case)\t29 3.1.1.8\tTransport and Handshake in IPv6/TLS Environment (negative case)\t29 3.1.2\tManage Alarm Requests\t29 3.1.2.1\tSubscription to Notifications\t29 3.1.3\tM-Plane Connection Supervision\t30 3.1.3.1\tM-Plane connection supervision (positive case)\t30 3.1.3.2\tM-Plane Connection Supervision (negative case)\t31 3.1.4\tRetrieval of O-RU's information elements\t32 3.1.4.1\tRetrieval without Filter Applied\t32 3.1.4.2\tRetrieval with filter applied\t33 3.1.5\tFault Management\t33 3.1.5.1\tO-RU Alarm Notification Generation\t33 3.1.5.2\tRetrieval of Active Alarm List\t35 3.1.6\tO-RU Software Update\t36 3.1.6.1\tO-RU Software Update and Install (positive case)\t36 3.1.6.2\tO-RU Software Update (negative case)\t37 3.1.7\tO-RU Software Activation\t39 3.1.7.1\tSoftware Activation without Reset\t39 3.1.7.2\tSupplemental Reset after Software Activation\t40 3.1.8\tAccess Control\t41 3.1.8.1\tSudo on Hybrid M-plane Architecture (positive case)\t41 3.1.8.2\tAccess Control Sudo (negative case)\t44 3.1.8.3\tAccess Control NMS (negative case)\t46 3.1.8.4\tAccess Control FM-PM (negative case)\t47 3.1.8.5\tAccess Control SWM (negative case)\t48 3.1.8.6\tSudo on Hierarchical M-plane architecture (positive case)\t49 3.1.8.7\tAccess Control SMO (negative case)\t51 3.1.8.8\tAccess Control Hybrid-ODU (negative case)\t52 3.1.8.9\tAccess Control Carrier (negative case)\t53 3.1.8.10\tAccess Control change own password\t53 3.1.9\tExternal Input / Output Ports\t54 3.1.9.1\tExternal Input Port State Detection\t54 3.1.9.2\tExternal Output Port State Control\t56 3.1.10\tO-RU Configurability\t57 3.1.10.1\tO-RU Configurability Test (positive case)\t57", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 technical specification is a document created by the O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V. that outlines the conformance test specifications for the O-RAN Fronthaul Working Group. It includes the revision history, scope, references, definitions, abbreviations, test configuration, and conformance measurements for the O-RU and O-DU as devices under test. The specification covers various test scenarios, such as transport and handshake, manage alarm requests, M-plane connection supervision, retrieval of O-RU's information elements, fault management, O-RU software update, O-RU software activation, access control, external input/output ports, and O-RU configurability.", "question": "What is the purpose of the O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 technical specification?", "answer": "The O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 technical specification is a document produced by the O-RAN Alliance that provides guidelines for the configuration and management of O-RAN networks. The purpose of this specification is to define a common framework for the configuration and management of O-RAN networks, including the definition of common interfaces, protocols, and data models.\n\nThe O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 specification is intended to provide a foundation for the development of interoperable O-RAN solutions, allowing for the integration of components from different vendors into a single network. The specification covers a wide range of topics related to the configuration and management of O-RAN networks, including network topology, network functions, and network services.\n\nIn addition, the O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 specification provides guidance on the use of open source software and tools for the configuration and management of O-RAN networks. This includes the use of open source software for network orchestration, network automation, and network monitoring.\n\nOverall, the purpose of the O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00 technical specification is to provide a common framework for the configuration and management of O-RAN networks, promoting interoperability and the use of open source software and tools.", "contexts": [" 6 \u00a9 2023 by the O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V. Your use is subject to the copyright statement on the cover page of this specification. O-RAN.WG7.EMC-HAR-HRD.0-R003-v01.00 1 Scope The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within O-RAN and may change following formal O-RAN approval. Should the O-RAN Alliance modify the contents of the present document, it will be re- released by O-RAN with an identifying change of version date and an increase in version number as follows: version xx.yy.zz where:", "O-RAN.WG4.MP.0-R003-v13.00 O-RAN.WG4.MP.0-R003-v13.00 O-RAN.WG4.MP.0-R003-v13.00 O-RAN.WG4.MP.0-R003-v13.00 Technical Specification O-RAN Working Group 4 (Open Fronthaul Interfaces WG) Management Plane Specification \t\t Copyright \u00a9 2023 by the O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V.", " 4 \u00a9 2023 by the O-RAN ALLIANCE e.V. Your use is subject to the copyright statement on the cover page of this specification. O-RAN.WG2.A1TS-R003-v03.00 1 Scope The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within O-RAN and may change following formal O-RAN approval. Should the O-RAN Alliance modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by O-RAN with an identifying change of version date and an increase in version number as follows: version xx.yy.zz where: xx: the first digit-group is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements,"]}, {"gt_context": "3.1.9.1\tExternal Input Port State Detection\t54 3.1.9.2\tExternal Output Port State Control\t56 3.1.10\tO-RU Configurability\t57 3.1.10.1\tO-RU Configurability Test (positive case)\t57 3.1.10.2\tO-RU Configurability Test (negative case)\t59 3.1.11\tALD Communications\t60 3.1.11.1\tALD Communications Test\t60 3.1.12\tLog Management\t63 3.1.12.1\tTroubleshooting Test\t63 3.1.12.2\tTrace Test\t65 3.1.13\tConnectivity Check\t68 3.1.13.1\tEthernet Connectivity Monitoring\t68 3.1.13.2\tUDP Echo Test\t68 3.1.14\tEnergy Savings\t69 3.1.14.1\tCarrier Deactivation and Energy Saving Configuration\t69 3.1.14.2\tCarrier Activation\t70 3.1.14.3\tSubscription and Reporting of Energy, Power and Environmental (EPE) Statistics\t71 3.2\tUC-Plane Measurements O-RU\t73 3.2.1\tUC-Plane Standard Test Definitions\t73 3.2.1.1\tUC-Plane Measurements, O-RU TEST SCENARIO\t73 3.2.2\tMinimum Capabilities of the TER for U-Plane and C-Plane Tests\t83 3.2.2.1\tSignal Analyzer\t83 3.2.2.2\tSignal Generator\t83 3.2.2.3\tCUSM-Plane Emulator (CUSM-E)\t83 3.2.3\tFR1 FDD Conducted-Signal Tests\t83 3.2.3.1\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG)\t83 3.2.3.2\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM)\t129 3.2.3.3\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP)\t158 3.2.3.4\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM)\t182 3.2.3.5\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Transport (TRN)\t190 3.2.3.6\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA)\t190 3.2.3.7\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE)\t193 3.2.3.8\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3)\t200 3.2.4\tFR1 FDD Non-conducted OTA Signal Tests\t204 3.2.4.1\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG)\t204 3.2.4.2\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM)\t204 3.2.4.3\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP)\t218 3.2.4.4\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM)\t218 3.2.4.5\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Transport (TRN)\t218 3.2.4.6\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA)\t218 3.2.4.7\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE)\t218 3.2.4.8\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3)\t226 3.2.5\tFR1 TDD Conducted Signal Tests\t227 3.2.5.1\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG)\t227 3.2.5.2\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM)\t254 3.2.5.3\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP)\t268 3.2.5.4\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM)\t291 3.2.5.5\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Transport (TRN)\t291 3.2.5.6\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA)\t291 3.2.5.7\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE)\t291 3.2.5.8\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3)\t291 3.2.6\tFR1 and FR2 TDD Non-conducted OTA Signal Tests\t292 3.2.6.1\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG)\t292 3.2.6.2\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM)\t317 3.2.6.3\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP)\t329 3.2.6.4\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM)\t329 3.2.6.5\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Transport (TRN)\t329 3.2.6.6\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA)\t329 3.2.6.7\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE)\t329 3.2.6.8\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3)\t329 3.3\tS-Plane Conformance Tests\t330 3.3.1\tTest Environment\t332 3.3.2\tFunctional test of O-RU using ITU-T G.8275.1 profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3)\t335 3.3.3\tPerformance test of O-RU using ITU-T G.8275.1 Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3)\t337 3.3.4\tPerformance test of O-RU using LLS-C4\t342 3.3.5\tFunctional test of O-DU Synchronized from ITU-T G.8275.1 profile PRTC/T-GM (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4)\t342 3.3.6\tFunctional test of O-DU Synchronized from Embedded or Local non-PTP PRTC (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4)\t346 3.3.7\tPerformance test of O-DU Synchronized from either Local or Remote PRTC using ITU-T G.8275.1 PTP Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4)\t347 3.3.8\tPerformance test of O-DU Synchronized from Embedded GNSS receiver (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4)\t350 3.3.9\tPerformance test of O-RU using ITU-T G.8275.1 Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3), additional tests for cascaded O-RUs\t352 3.4\tUC-Plane Measurements O-DU\t352 3.4.1\tUC-Plane Tests\t352 3.4.2\tUC-Plane Standard Test Definitions\t352 3.4.3\tMinimum Capabilities of the TED for U-Plane and C-Plane Tests\t353 3.4.3.1\tCore + O-CU Emulator for Testing a Stand-alone O-DU DUT\t353 3.4.3.2\tCore Emulator for Testing a Combined O-CU + O-DU DUT\t353 3.4.3.3\tX2 Signalling Emulator for NSA\t353 3.4.3.4\tO-RU Emulator\t353 3.4.3.5\tUE Emulator\t353 3.4.3.6\tTest Configurator through O1 or EMS Interface\t353 3.4.4\tUC-Plane O-DU Test Scenarios\t354 3.4.4.1\tUC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG)\t354 3.4.4.2\tUC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM)\t355 3.4.4.3\tUC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Compression (CMP)\t357 3.4.4.4\tUC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM)\t359 3.5\tShared-Cell Test Scenarios\t361 3.5.1\tFHM mode Tests\t361 3.5.1.1\tFHM M-Plane Tests\t361 3.5.1.2\tFHM UC-Plane Tests\t374 \t\t\t Introductory Material Foreword This Technical Specification has been produced by the O-RAN Alliance. The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within O-RAN and may change following formal O-RAN approval. Should the O-RAN Alliance modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by O-RAN with an identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows: Release x.y.z where: x\tthe first digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections, updates, etc. (the initial approved document will have x=01). y\tthe second digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document. z\tthe third digit included only in working versions of the document indicating incremental changes during the editing process. Scope General", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The UC-Plane test scenarios in the O-RAN Technical Specification are used to test various functionalities of the O-RAN architecture, such as beamforming, compression, delay management, and transport. These scenarios are used to ensure that the O-RAN components, such as O-RU, O-DU, and O-CU, comply with the O-RAN specifications and are interoperable with each other.", "question": "What is the purpose of the different UC-Plane test scenarios in the O-RAN Technical Specification?", "answer": "The O-RAN Technical Specification defines a set of test scenarios for the User Plane (UC-Plane) to verify the correct operation of the O-RAN architecture. The UC-Plane test scenarios are designed to cover various aspects of the O-RAN architecture, including the Radio Unit (RU), the Distributed Unit (DU), and the Centralized Unit (CU).\n\nThe purpose of the UC-Plane test scenarios is to ensure that the O-RAN architecture meets the requirements for various use cases, such as enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC), and massive machine-type communications (mMTC). The test scenarios cover a wide range of functionalities, including radio resource management, mobility management, and security.\n\nThe UC-Plane test scenarios are divided into two categories: conformance test scenarios and performance test scenarios. The conformance test scenarios are designed to verify the compliance of the O-RAN architecture with the O-RAN specifications, while the performance test scenarios are designed to evaluate the performance of the O-RAN architecture under various conditions.\n\nThe conformance test scenarios cover various aspects of the O-RAN architecture, including the interfaces between the RU, DU, and CU, the protocols used for communication between these components, and the procedures for radio resource management and mobility management. The performance test scenarios, on the other hand, evaluate the performance of the O-RAN architecture in terms of throughput, latency, and jitter, among other metrics.\n\nIn summary, the purpose of the UC-Plane test scenarios in the O-RAN Technical Specification is to verify the correct operation of the O-RAN architecture and to evaluate its performance under various conditions. The test scenarios cover a wide range of functionalities and use cases, and they are designed to ensure that the O-RAN architecture meets the requirements for various applications and services.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "Scope General The present document defines tests that validate the conformance to the protocols defined in [2] for the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and the O-DU. A guiding principle for these conformance tests is to use only standard interfaces that are defined by the specification [2] or relevant 3GPP specifications. The construction of these tests avoids the requirement for a device to include any special interfaces used solely for the purpose of these tests. While these tests are not written to evaluate the performance of an O-DU or O-RU device, some tests require obtaining measurements and evaluating the success or failure of the device to process sample data correctly based on portion of the protocol being tested at the time. In general, unless otherwise stated, the tests cover LTE (Stand-Alone), NR Non-Stand-Alone (NSA) and NR Stand-Alone (SA). In the main body of this specification (in any \u201cchapter\u201d) the information contained therein is normative meaning binding on any compliant system, unless explicitly described as informative (a capability described as \u201coptional\u201d may or may not be included in a compliant system but if it is included it must comply with the optional capability description). Information contained in an \u201cAnnex\u201d to this specification is always informative. U-Plane and C-Plane Scope This version of the Conformance Test specification defines tests which validate the conformance of an O-RU and O-DU. The tests are designed to cover a large number of optional functionalities defined in [2]. Therefore, for any given O-RU implementation, a subset of these tests may not be applicable. It is the responsibility of the tester to understand the applicability of each test to the feature provided by a particular O-RU. S-Plane The Conformance Test specification defines tests for time synchronization of the O-RU and O-DU. The tests defined include both functional and performance tests. Functional tests validate the ability of the O-RU and O-DU to achieve the proper synchronization management state based on a variety of PTP, and optionally SyncE input conditions. Performance tests validate the conformance of the recovered clock for the O-DU or O-RU. Concerning the scope of the S-Plane, various synchronization options have been defined in the O-RAN CUS Specification [2] for distributing synchronization to the O-RU (LLS-C1, LLS-C2, LLS-C3 and LLS-C4). Depending on the specific O-RAN deployment being considered not all of them may be relevant. When testing the S-Plane, the tester shall identify which of the test cases are relevant depending on the specific deployment scenarios addressed. As a general guideline the following applies: \t\tDirect connection between O-DU and O-RU: LLS-C1 is generally the main sync option to be validated. LLS-C4 may be considered as alternative or as a complement to C1 \t\tSynchronization network between O-DU and O-RU LLS-C2 for cases where the synchronization is delivered to the O-RU via the O-DU and over the bridged network. In this topology the PRTC synchronizing the O-DU may be local or remote. LLS-C3 for cases when the synchronization is distributed to the O-RU without involving the O-DU. In this case one or more PRTC may be remote and may also be local. LLS-C4 may be considered as alternative or as a complement to LLS-C2/C3 For LLS-C1 and LLS-C2, a local PRTC is either embedded in or co-located with the O-DU. A remote PRTC is located anywhere in the network (backhaul or fronthaul). Test Requirement Status The following tables list each test in this conformance specification and status of the test as MANDATORY or CONDITIONAL MANDATORY. Note that tests that are MANDATORY are for those functions of the DUT that by specification are required to be supported. Optional functionality in a DUT implies that the corresponding conformance test is CONDITIONAL MANDATORY and is mandatory only if the DUT supports the optional functionality.", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The O-RAN Conformance Test specification validates the conformance of O-RU and O-DU to protocols defined in [2] for the Option 7.2x interface. It uses only standard interfaces and avoids special interfaces for testing. The tests cover LTE, NR NSA, and NR SA, and are normative unless described as informative. The specification includes U-Plane and C-Plane tests, with a subset applicable to each O-RU implementation. S-Plane tests cover time synchronization functional and performance tests for various synchronization options (LLS-C1, LLS-C2, LLS-C3, and LLS-C4). The tester should identify relevant test cases based on the specific O-RAN deployment scenario. Test requirements are marked as MANDATORY or CONDITIONAL MANDATORY.", "question": "What is the purpose and scope of the O-RAN Conformance Test specification for the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and O-DU?", "answer": "The purpose of the O-RAN Conformance Test specification for the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and O-DU is to define tests that validate the conformance to the protocols defined in [2] for this interface. The tests are designed to ensure that the O-RU and O-DU are compliant with the O-RAN specifications and can interoperate with other O-RAN compliant components.\n\nThe scope of the specification is limited to the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and O-DU. It does not cover other interfaces or components in the O-RAN architecture. The tests defined in the specification are designed to be conducted using only standard interfaces defined by the O-RAN specifications or relevant 3GPP specifications. The construction of the tests avoids the requirement for special interfaces or additional hardware or software that is solely for the purpose of the tests.", "contexts": ["Scope General The present document defines tests that validate the conformance to the protocols defined in [2] for the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and the O-DU. A guiding principle for these conformance tests is to use only standard interfaces that are defined by the specification [2] or relevant 3GPP specifications. The construction of these tests avoids the requirement for a device to include any special interfaces used solely for the purpose of these tests.", "Scope General The present document defines tests that validate the conformance to the protocols defined in [2] for the Lower Layer Split Option 7.2x interface between the O-RU and the O-DU. A guiding principle for these conformance tests is to use only standard interfaces that are defined by the specification [2] or relevant 3GPP specifications. The construction of these tests avoids the requirement for a device to include any special interfaces used solely for the purpose of these tests."]}, {"gt_context": "The M-Plane conformance tests are applicable to both the O-RU and the O-DU. Some of the M-Plane tests are specifically targeting the protocol conformance of the O-RU and are not necessary for conformance testing of a O-DU. Therefore, for M-Plane tests, the table below has two \u201cTest Requirement\u201d columns describing if the test is mandatory, conditional mandatory or optional for testing an O-RU or a O-DU. If a test is OPTIONAL, it does not need to be included in a conformance test of the device but could be included if desired. Table 1.2.41 List of M-PlaneTest Scenarios and Status Test Number O-RU Test Requirement O-DU Test Requirement Test Description M-Plane 3.1.1.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv4/SSH Environment (positive case) 3.1.1.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv4/SSH Environment (negative case) 3.1.1.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv6/SSH Environment (positive case) 3.1.1.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv6/SSH Environment (negative case) 3.1.1.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv4/TLS Environment (positive case) 3.1.1.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv4/TLS Environment (negative case) 3.1.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv6/TLS Environment (positive case) 3.1.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Transport and Handshake in IPv6/TLS Environment (negative case) 3.1.2.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY Subscription to Notifications 3.1.3.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY M-Plane Connection Supervision (positive case) 3.1.3.2 MANDATORY MANDATORY M-Plane Connection Supervision (negative case) 3.1.4.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY Retrieval without Filter Applied 3.1.4.2 MANDATORY MANDATORY Retrieval with Filter Applied 3.1.5.1 MANDATORY OPTIONAL O-RU Alarm Notification Generation 3.1.5.2 MANDATORY OPTIONAL Retrieval of Active Alarm List 3.1.6.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY O-RU Software Update (positive case) 3.1.6.2 MANDATORY OPTIONAL O-RU Software Update (negative case) 3.1.7.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY Software Activation without Reset 3.1.7.2 MANDATORY OPTIONAL Supplemental Reset after Software Activation 3.1.8.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Sudo on Hybrid M-plane Architecture (positive case) 3.1.8.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control Sudo (negative case) 3.1.8.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control NMS (negative case) 3.1.8.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control FM-PM (negative case) 3.1.8.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control SWM (negative case) 3.1.8.6 MANDATORY MANDATORY Sudo on Hierarchical M-plane architecture (positive case) 3.1.8.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control SMO (negative case) 3.1.8.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL Access Control Hybrid-ODU (negative case) 3.1.8.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY \tOPTIONAL Access Control Carrier (negative case) 3.1.8.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY \tCONDITIONAL MANDATORY Access Control change own password 3.1.9.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL External Input / Output Ports 3.1.9.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL External Output Port State Control 3.1.10.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY O-RU configurability test (positive case) 3.1.10.2 MANDATORY OPTIONAL O-RU configurability test (negative case) 3.1.11.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY OPTIONAL ALD Communications Test 3.1.12.1 MANDATORY MANDATORY Troubleshooting Test 3.1.12.2 MANDATORY MANDATORY Trace Test 3.1.13.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Ethernet Connectivity Monitoring 3.1.13.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UDP Echo Test 3.1.14.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Carrier Deactivation And Energy Saving Configuration 3.1.14.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Carrier Activation 3.1.14.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Subscription and Reporting of Energy, Power and Environmental (EPE) Statistics \t Table 1.2.42 List of O-RU UC-Plane Test Scenarios and Status Test Number O-RU Test Requirement Test Description UC-Plane: FR1 FDD Conducted-Signal Tests UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.3.1.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.3.1.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.3.1.3 MANDATORY Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL 3.2.3.1.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.5 MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Extension 10 \u2013 Multiple Port Grouping DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.3.1.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended multiple port grouping using section extension 10 UL\u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via Frequency and Time 3.2.3.1.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via time and frequency 3.2.3.1.16 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation \u2013 Section Description Priorities 3.2.3.1.17 N/A (VOID) 3.2.3.1.18 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 12 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.19 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.1.20 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Static SRS allocation 3.2.3.1.21 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Static PRACH allocation 3.2.3.1.22 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using section extension 13 for frequency hopping UL \u2013 Resource Allocation", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "For M-Plane conformance tests, some tests are mandatory, conditional mandatory, or optional for testing an O-RU or a O-DU. For example, tests 3.1.5.1 and 3.1.5.2 (O-RU Alarm Notification Generation and Retrieval of Active Alarm List) are mandatory for O-RU but optional for O-DU. Similarly, tests 3.1.8.1 to 3.1.8.5 (Access Control for various components) are conditional mandatory for O-RU but optional for O-DU. Additionally, tests 3.1.8.6 to 3.1.8.10 (Access Control for various components in hierarchical M-plane architecture) are mandatory for O-RU but conditional mandatory for O-DU. Lastly, test 3.1.9.1 (External Input / Output Ports) is conditional mandatory for O-RU but optional for O-DU, while test 3.1.9.2 (External Output Port State Control) is optional for both O-RU and O-DU.", "question": "What is the difference in M-Plane test requirements between O-RU and O-DU?", "answer": "The M-Plane test requirements for the O-RU (O-RAN Radio Unit) and O-DU (O-RAN Distributed Unit) are different due to the different functions and responsibilities of each component in the O-RAN architecture.\n\nThe O-RU is responsible for the radio frequency (RF) functions, such as transmitting and receiving radio signals, and is connected to the O-DU via the O-RAN fronthaul interface. The M-Plane test requirements for the O-RU focus on testing the RF performance, including the transmit power, receiver sensitivity, and signal quality.\n\nThe O-DU, on the other hand, is responsible for the baseband processing functions, such as encoding and decoding of user data, and is connected to the O-RU via the O-RAN fronthaul interface and to the core network via the O-RAN midhaul interface. The M-Plane test requirements for the O-DU focus on testing the baseband processing functions, including the data throughput, latency, and error rate.\n\nIn addition to the functional differences, the M-Plane test requirements for the O-RU and O-DU also differ in terms of the test methodology and test cases. For example, the O-RU tests may involve over-the-air (OTA) testing, while the O-DU tests may involve emulation of the RF environment. The test cases for the O-RU may include testing of the RF parameters, such as the power and frequency, while the test cases for the O-DU may include testing of the protocol stack and data processing functions.\n\nIn summary, the M-Plane test requirements for the O-RU and O-DU are different due to the different functions and responsibilities of each component in the O-RAN architecture, as well as the different test methodologies and test cases required to verify their performance.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "3.2.3.1.22 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using section extension 13 for frequency hopping UL \u2013 Resource Allocation UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3.2.3.2.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.3.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.3.2.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.3.2.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.3.2.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.3.2.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.3.2.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.3.2.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.3.2.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming 3.2.3.2.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming 3.2.3.2.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Flexible Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.3.2.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Flexible Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.3.2.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Flexible Real Time Weights Beamforming 3.2.3.2.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Flexible Real Time Weights Beamforming 3.2.3.2.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Layer nulling Beamforming 3.2.3.2.16 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Layer nulling Beamforming 3.2.3.2.17 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming with mixed numerology 3.2.3.2.18 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Bit masking for antenna mapping in Channel-Information-based Beamforming in uplink direction 3.2.3.2.19 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 User port grouping in Channel-Information-based Beamforming in downlink direction UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP) 3.2.3.3.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Fixed-Point (FP) 3.2.3.3.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point (BFP) 3.2.3.3.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Scaling 3.2.3.3.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.3.3.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Modulation-Compression 3.2.3.3.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Fixed-Point (FPF) 3.2.3.3.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Floating Point 3.2.3.3.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Scaling (BSC) 3.2.3.3.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.3.3.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Modulation-Compressed Format 3.2.3.3.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.3.3.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) mod-compr + Selective RE Format 3.2.3.3.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.3.3.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM) 3.2.3.4.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #1: Downlink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.3.4.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #2: Uplink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.3.4.3 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #3: Downlink \u2013 Negative testing 3.2.3.4.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #4: Uplink \u2013 Negative Testing \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA) 3.2.3.6.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CU-DU-LAA-CWM Test #1: LBT PDSCH Configuration and Response \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE) 3.2.3.7.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL 3.2.3.7.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.7.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.3.7.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.3.7.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) TxD 3.2.3.7.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) SM \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3) 3.2.3.8.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #1: NR PRACH 3.2.3.8.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #2: LTE PRACH UC-Plane: FR1 FDD Non-conducted OTA Signal Tests UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.4.1.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.4.1.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.4.1.3 MANDATORY Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL 3.2.4.1.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.5 MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask Parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask Parameter 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The Conditional Mandatory UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes related to Beamforming include: Frequency hopping UL \u2013 Resource Allocation UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Flexible Predefined-beam Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Flexible Predefined-beam Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Flexible Real Time Weights Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Flexible Real Time Weights Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Layer nulling Beamforming, 3GPP UL \u2013 Layer nulling Beamforming, 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming with mixed numerology, 3GPP UL \u2013 Bit masking for antenna mapping in Channel-Information-based Beamforming in uplink direction. The Conditional Mandatory UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes related to Compression include: Static Format (SF) Fixed-Point (FP), Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point (BFP), Static Format (SF) Block Scaling, Static Format (SF) Mu-Law (MLW), Static Format (SF) Modulation-Compression, Non-Static (NS) Fixed-Point (FPF), Non-Static (NS) Block Floating Point, Non-Static (NS) Block Scaling (BSC), Non-Static (NS) Mu-Law (MLW), Non-Static Format (NS) Modulation-Compressed Format, Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format, Static Format (SF) mod-compr + Selective RE Format, Non-Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format, Non-Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format.", "question": "What are some of the Conditional Mandatory UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes related to Beamforming and Compression in the given text?", "answer": "The Conditional Mandatory UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes related to Beamforming and Compression in the given text are as follows:\n\n1. Beamforming with Compression: This scenario class requires the O-RU to support beamforming and compression capabilities. The O-RU must be able to receive and process beamforming commands from the O-DU, as well as compress and decompress the uplink and downlink signals.\n\n2. Beamforming without Compression: This scenario class requires the O-RU to support beamforming capabilities, but not compression. The O-RU must be able to receive and process beamforming commands from the O-DU, but it does not need to compress or decompress the uplink and downlink signals.\n\n3. Compression without Beamforming: This scenario class requires the O-RU to support compression capabilities, but not beamforming. The O-RU must be able to compress and decompress the uplink and downlink signals, but it does not need to receive or process beamforming commands from the O-DU.\n\n4. No Beamforming or Compression: This scenario class requires the O-RU to support neither beamforming nor compression capabilities. The O-RU must be able to transmit and receive signals without any additional processing.\n\nThese scenario classes are defined to provide flexibility in the design and deployment of O-RUs, allowing for different levels of functionality depending on the specific requirements of the network.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "3.2.4.1.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Extension 10 \u2013 Multiple Port Grouping DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.4.1.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended multiple port grouping using section extension 10 UL\u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via Frequency and Time 3.2.4.1.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via time and frequency 3.2.4.1.16 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation \u2013 Section Description Priorities 3.2.4.1.17 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Section Description Priorities 3.2.4.1.18 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 12 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.19 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.1.20 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Static SRS allocation 3.2.4.1.21 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class FDD Test UL \u2013 Static PRACH allocation 3.2.4.1.22 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using section extension 13 for frequency hopping UL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3.2.4.2.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.4.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.4.2.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.4.2.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.4.2.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.4.2.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.4.2.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.4.2.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.4.2.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming 3.2.4.2.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP) 3.2.4.3.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Fixed-Point (FP) 3.2.4.3.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point (BFP) 3.2.4.3.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Scaling 3.2.4.3.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.4.3.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Modulation-Compression 3.2.4.3.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Fixed-Point (FPF) 3.2.4.3.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Floating Point 3.2.4.3.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Scaling (BSC) 3.2.4.3.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.4.3.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Modulation-Compressed Format 3.2.4.3.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.4.3.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) mod-compr + Selective RE Format 3.2.4.3.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.4.3.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM) 3.2.4.4.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #1: Downlink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.4.4.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #2: Uplink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.4.4.3 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #3: Downlink \u2013 Negative testing 3.2.4.4.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #4: Uplink \u2013 Negative Testing \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA) 3.2.4.6.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CU-DU-LAA-CWM Test #1: LBT PDSCH Configuration and Response \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE) 3.2.4.7.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL 3.2.4.7.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.7.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.4.7.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.4.7.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) TxD 3.2.4.7.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) SM \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3) 3.2.4.8.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #1: NR PRACH 3.2.4.8.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #2: LTE PRACH UC-Plane: FR1 TDD Conducted Signal Tests UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.5.1.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL/UL 3.2.5.1.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.3 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via time and frequency 3.2.5.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class in the provided context refers to a set of mandatory and conditional test cases and requirements for Open Radio Unit (O-RU) scenarios in a 5G network. These scenarios cover various functionalities such as resource allocation, beamforming, compression, delay management, LAA, LTE, and NR testing. Each scenario class has specific conditions and requirements that need to be met for proper O-RU operation in a 5G network.", "question": "What is the purpose of the UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class in the given context?", "answer": "The UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class in the context of Open Radio Access Network (ORAN) specifications refers to the user plane (UC) data path between the O-RU (Open Radio Unit) and the O-DU (Open Distributed Unit). The purpose of this scenario class is to define the protocols, interfaces, and procedures for the transmission of user data between the O-RU and the O-DU.\n\nIn this scenario class, the O-RU is responsible for transmitting and receiving user data over the air interface, while the O-DU is responsible for processing and forwarding the user data to the core network. The UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class defines the protocols and procedures for the exchange of user data between these two components, including the encoding and decoding of data, the handling of errors and retransmissions, and the management of radio resources.\n\nThe UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class is an important aspect of the ORAN specifications, as it provides a standardized framework for the transmission of user data in an open and interoperable radio access network. By defining a common set of protocols and procedures for the exchange of user data, the UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class helps to ensure that different components from different vendors can work together seamlessly in an ORAN deployment.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "3.2.5.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via time and frequency 3.2.5.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via Time and Frequency and Section Description Priorities 3.2.5.1.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation using section extension 12 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Static SRS Allocation UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.1.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class TDD Test UL \u2013 Static PRACH allocation 3.2.5.1.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using section extension 13 for frequency hopping UL/DL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3.2.5.2.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.5.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.5.2.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.5.2.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.5.2.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.5.2.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.5.2.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.5.2.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.5.2.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming 3.2.5.2.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP) 3.2.5.3.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Fixed-Point (FP) 3.2.5.3.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point (BFP) 3.2.5.3.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Scaling 3.2.5.3.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.5.3.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Modulation-Compression 3.2.5.3.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Fixed-Point (FPF) 3.2.5.3.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Floating Point 3.2.5.3.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Scaling (BSC) 3.2.5.3.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.5.3.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Modulation-Compressed Format 3.2.5.3.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.5.3.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) mod-compr + Selective RE Format 3.2.5.3.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.5.3.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM) 3.2.5.4.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #1: Downlink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.5.4.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #2: Uplink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.5.4.3 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #3: Downlink \u2013 Negative testing 3.2.5.4.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #4: Uplink \u2013 Negative Testing \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA) 3.2.5.6.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CU-DU-LAA-CWM Test #1: LBT PDSCH Configuration and Response \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE) 3.2.5.7.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL 3.2.5.7.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.7.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.5.7.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask parameter 3GPP DL \u2013 Resource allocation 3.2.5.7.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) TxD 3.2.5.7.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class With Precoding (WPR) SM \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3) 3.2.5.8.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #1: NR PRACH 3.2.5.8.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #2: LTE PRACH \u00a0 UC-Plane: FR1 and FR2 TDD Non-conducted OTA Signal Tests UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.2.6.1.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL/UL 3.2.6.1.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.3 MANDATORY 3.2.6.1.3\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using SymInc parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY 3.2.6.1.4\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using reMask parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY 3.2.6.1.5\tUC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using RB parameter 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation Section Extension 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via time and frequency 3.2.6.1.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Coupling C and U plane via Time and Frequency and Section Description Priorities 3.2.6.1.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using Non-contiguous PRB Allocation using section extension 12 3GPP DL/UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Static SRS Allocation UL \u2013 Resource Allocation 3.2.6.1.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Base Class TDD Test UL \u2013 Static PRACH allocation 3.2.6.1.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC Plane O-RU Scenario Class Extended using section extension 13 for frequency hopping UL/DL \u2013 Resource Allocation \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3.2.6.2.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.6.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.6.2.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "The UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes are a series of mandatory and conditional test scenarios for Open RAN (O-RU) units in a 3GPP network environment. These scenarios cover various aspects of O-RU functionality, including resource allocation, beamforming, compression, delay management, and more. They are used to ensure that O-RU units comply with 3GPP specifications and can interoperate effectively with other network components.", "question": "What is the purpose of the UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes in the given context?", "answer": "The UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes refer to the different scenarios in which the Open Radio Unit (O-RU) can be used in the User Plane (UC-Plane) of an Open Radio Access Network (RAN). These scenario classes are defined in the ORAN specifications to provide a framework for the development and deployment of O-RUs that can be used in different deployment scenarios.\n\nThe purpose of the UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes is to define the requirements and capabilities of the O-RU for different deployment scenarios, such as indoor or outdoor deployment, support for different frequency bands, and support for different radio access technologies (RATs). This allows network operators to select the appropriate O-RU for their specific deployment scenario, and ensures that the O-RU is designed to meet the requirements of that scenario.\n\nThe UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Classes also provide a common framework for the development and testing of O-RUs, which can help to ensure interoperability between different components of the RAN and reduce the cost and complexity of deployment.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming (BFM) 3.2.6.2.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.6.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 No Beamforming 3.2.6.2.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.6.2.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.2.6.2.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.6.2.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Weight-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.6.2.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.6.2.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Attribute-based Dynamic Beamforming 3.2.6.2.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP DL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming 3.2.6.2.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP UL \u2013 Channel-Information-based Beamforming \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression (CMP) 3.2.6.3.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Fixed-Point (FP) 3.2.6.3.3 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Floating Point (BFP) 3.2.6.3.4 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Block Scaling 3.2.6.3.5 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.6.3.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (SF) Modulation-Compression 3.2.6.3.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Fixed-Point (FPF) 3.2.6.3.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Floating Point 3.2.6.3.9 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Block Scaling (BSC) 3.2.6.3.10 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static (NS) Mu-Law (MLW) 3.2.6.3.11 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Modulation-Compressed Format 3.2.6.3.12 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.6.3.13 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format 3.2.6.3.14 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) Block Floating Point + Selective RE Format 3.2.6.3.15 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression Non-Static Format (NS) mod-compr + Selective RE Format UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Delay Management (DLM) 3.2.6.4.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #1: Downlink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.6.4.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #2: Uplink \u2013 Positive testing 3.2.6.4.3 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #3: Downlink \u2013 Negative testing 3.2.6.4.4 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class DLM Test #4: Uplink \u2013 Negative Testing \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LAA (LAA) 3.2.6.6.1 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY CU-DU-LAA-CWM Test #1: LBT PDSCH Configuration and Response \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class LTE (LTE) 3.2.6.7 For Future Study \u00a0 UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Section Type 3 (ST3) 3.2.6.8.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #1: NR PRACH 3.2.6.8.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class ST3 Test #2: LTE PRACH Table 1.2.43 List of O-RU or O-DU S-Plane Test Scenarios and Status S-Plane Conformance Tests Test Number O-RU or O-DU Test Requirement Test Description 3.3.2 MANDATORY Functional test of O-RU using ITU-T G.8275.1 Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3) 3.3.3 MANDATORY Performance test of O-RU using ITU-T G.8275.1 Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3) 3.3.4 For Future Study Performance test of O-RU using LLS-C4 3.3.5 MANDATORY Functional test of O-DU Synchronized from ITU-T G.8275.1 profile PRTC/T-GM (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4) 3.3.6 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Functional test of O-DU Synchronized from Embedded or Local non-PTP PRTC (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4) 3.3.7 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Performance test of O-DU Synchronized from either Local or Remote PRTC using ITU-T G.8275.1 PTP Profile (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4) 3.3.8 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY Performance test of O-DU Synchronized from Embedded GNSS receiver (LLS-C1/C2/C3/C4) Table 1.2.44 List of O-DU UC-Plane Test Scenarios and Status UC-Plane Measurements O-DU Test Number O-DU Test Requirement Test Description 3.4.4.1.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class NR testing Generic (NRG) 3.4.4.1.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Base CAT-B O-RU 3.4.4.2.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP \u2013 Predefined-beam Beamforming 3.4.4.2.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Beamforming 3GPP \u2013 Weight-based Beamforming 3.4.4.3.1 MANDATORY Static Format Fixed-Point (FP) Uncompressed 3.4.4.3.2 CONDITIONAL MANDATORY UC-Plane O-DU Scenario Class Compression (CMP) Static Format Block Floating Point 3.4.4.4.1 MANDATORY Delay Management On-time arrival 3.4.4.4.2 MANDATORY Delay Management Early Arrival and Late Arrival Table 1.2.45 List of FHM Test Scenarios and Status FHM M-Plane Measurements See Table 3.5.1.1-1 for FHM M-Plane Test Requirements FHM UC-Plane Measurements Test Number FHM Test Requirement Test Description 3.5.1.2.1 MANDATORY UC-Plane FHM Scenario Class Base 3GPP DL Same Cell Scenario 3.5.1.2.2 MANDATORY UC-Plane FHM Scenario Class Base 3GPP UL References The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document. -\tReferences are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or nonspecific. -\tFor a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply. -\tFor a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document. 3GPP\u00a0TR\u00a021.905, \u201cVocabulary for 3GPP Specifications\u201d O-RAN WG4 Control, User and Synchronization Specification version 12.00 O-RAN WG4 Management Plane Specification version 12.00 O-RAN Management Plane Yang Models version 12.00", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming refers to various beamforming scenarios for 3GPP downlink and uplink, while UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Compression refers to different compression formats for static and non-static data in the uplink and downlink.", "question": "What is the difference between UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming and Compression in the given table?", "answer": "In the context of Open Radio Access Network (ORAN) specifications, UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming and Compression refer to two different functionalities related to the operation of the radio unit (RU) in a wireless communication system.\n\nBeamforming:\nBeamforming is a technique used to direct a radio signal in a specific direction towards a particular user or device. In ORAN, beamforming is performed by the RU, which is responsible for transmitting and receiving radio signals. The RU uses multiple antennas to transmit the signal in a specific direction, which can improve the signal strength and reduce interference for the intended user.\n\nCompression:\nCompression refers to the process of reducing the size of data by encoding it in a more efficient manner. In ORAN, compression is used to reduce the amount of data that needs to be transmitted between the RU and the central unit (CU), which is responsible for processing and managing the radio signals. By compressing the data, the amount of bandwidth required for transmission can be reduced, which can improve the overall efficiency of the system.\n\nIn the given table, UC-Plane O-RU Scenario Class Beamforming and Compression are listed as two separate functionalities that can be supported by the RU. The table provides information about the different scenarios in which these functionalities can be used, as well as the level of support required for each scenario.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "O-RAN WG4 Management Plane Specification version 12.00 O-RAN Management Plane Yang Models version 12.00 ITU-T G.8275.1 (Amendment 2), Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with full timing support from the network, ITU, March 2018 ITU-T G.8275.2 (Amendment 2), Precision time protocol telecom profile for phase/time synchronization with partial timing support from the network, ITU, March 2018 ITU-T G.8271.1 (Amendment 1), \u201cNetwork limits for time synchronization in packet networks\u201d, ITU, March 2018 ITU-T G.8271.2 (Amendment 1), \u201cNetwork limits for time synchronization in packet networks with partial timing support from the network\u201d, ITU, March 2018 ITU-T G.8273, \u201cFramework of phase and time clocks\u201d, ITU, March 2018 ITU-T G.8261, \u201cTiming and synchronization aspects in packet networks\u201d, ITU, August 2013 eCPRI Specification v2.0 \u201cCommon Public Radio Interface: eCPRI Interface Specification\u201d, May 2019 3GPP TS 36.104, \u201cEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception\u201d 3GPP TS 38.104, \u201cNR; Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception\u201d 3GPP TS 36.211, \u201cEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) Physical channels and modulation\u201d 3GPP TS 38.211, \u201cNR; Physical channels and modulation\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 36.331, \u201cEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC)\u201d, Release 15, 3GPP 3GPP TS 38.331, \u201cNR; Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 36.141, \u201cEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Base Station (BS) conformance testing\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 38.141-1, \u201cNR; Base Station (BS) conformance testing Part 1: Conducted conformance testing (Release 15)\u201d, 3GPP 3GPP TS 38.141-2, \u201cNR; Base Station (BS) conformance testing Part 2: Radiated conformance testing\u201d (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 23.401, \u201cGeneral Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access\u201d, 3GPP 3GPP TS 23.502, \u201cProcedures for the 5G System (5GS)\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 37.340, \u201cEvolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and NR; Multi-connectivity\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP 3GPP TS 38.214, \u201cNR; Physical layer procedures for data\u201d, (Release 15), 3GPP O-RAN WG4 Fronthaul Interoperability Test Specification (IOT) version 07.00 ITU-T Recommendation G.8273.2/Y.1368.2 Amd. 2 (11/2022): \"Timing characteristics of telecom boundary clocks and telecom time slave clocks \u2013 Amendment 2\". Definitions For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in 3GPP\u00a0TR\u00a021.905, \u201cVocabulary for 3GPP Specifications\u201d[1]and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in [1] C-Plane\tControl Plane: refers specifically to real-time control between O-DU and O-RU, and should not be confused with the UE\u2019s control plane DL\tDownLink: data flow towards the radiating antenna eNB\teNodeB (applies to LTE) <E-UTRAN NodeB / Evolved NodeB> EVM\tError Vector Magnitude \u2013 see clause 6.5.2 Modulation quality in 3GPP TS 38.104 fm-pm\tFault Management, Performance Management role gNB\tgNodeB (applies to NR) <Next Generation NodeB> M-Plane\tManagement Plane: refers to non-real-time management operations between the O-DU and the O-RU NETCONF\tNetwork Configuration Protocol. For details see: RFC 6241, \u201cNetwork Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)\u201d, IETF, June 2011 NSA\tNon-Stand-Alone network mode that supports operation of SgNB attached to MeNB O-CU\tO-RAN Central Unit \u2013 a logical node hosting PDCP, RRC, SDAP and other control functions O-DU\tO-RAN Distributed Unit: a logical node hosting RLC/MAC/High-PHY layers based on a lower layer functional split. O-DU in addition hosts an M-Plane instance. O-RU\tO-RAN Radio Unit <O-RAN Radio Unit: a logical node hosting Low-PHY layer and RF processing based on a lower layer functional split. This is similar to 3GPP\u2019s \u201cTRP\u201d or \u201cRRH\u201d but more specific in including the Low-PHY layer (FFT/iFFT, PRACH extraction).>. O-RU in addition hosts M-Plane instance. PTP\tPrecision Time Protocol (PTP) is a protocol for distributing precise time and frequency over packet networks. PTP is defined in the IEEE Standard 1588. PDCCH\tPhysical Downlink Control Channel applies for LTE and NR air interface PBCH\tPhysical Broadcast Channel applies for LTE and NR air interface SA\tStand-Alone network mode that supports operation of gNB attached to a 5G Core Network SCS\tOFDM Sub Carrier Spacing SSB\tSynchronization Signal Block, in 5G PBCH and synchronization signal are packaged as a single block", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "O-DU (O-RAN Distributed Unit) is a logical node hosting RLC/MAC/High-PHY layers based on a lower layer functional split, and also hosts a Management Plane (M-Plane) instance. O-RU (O-RAN Radio Unit) is a logical node hosting Low-PHY layer and RF processing based on a lower layer functional split, which includes the Low-PHY layer (FFT/iFFT, PRACH extraction). O-RU also hosts an M-Plane instance.", "question": "What is the definition of O-DU and O-RU in the provided context?", "answer": "In the context of Open Radio Access Network (ORAN), O-DU and O-RU refer to the following components:\n\nO-DU: The O-DU (Open Distributed Unit) is a functional split of the baseband unit (BBU) in an ORAN architecture. It is responsible for processing and aggregating the radio signals received from multiple O-RUs (Open Radio Units) before forwarding them to the O-CU (Open Central Unit). The O-DU is typically located closer to the O-RUs, and it provides the necessary processing and coordination functions to support multiple radio access technologies (RATs) and multiple frequency bands.\n\nO-RU: The O-RU (Open Radio Unit) is a functional split of the radio unit (RU) in an ORAN architecture. It is responsible for transmitting and receiving radio signals to and from user equipment (UE) in a specific frequency band. The O-RU is typically located at the cell site, and it connects to the O-DU via a high-speed, low-latency interface. The O-RU can support multiple antenna configurations, including massive MIMO (Multiple Input, Multiple Output) and beamforming, to improve the capacity and coverage of the wireless network.\n\nIn summary, the O-DU and O-RU are key components of the ORAN architecture, which aims to provide a more flexible, scalable, and cost-effective approach to building and deploying wireless networks.", "contexts": []}, {"gt_context": "SCS\tOFDM Sub Carrier Spacing SSB\tSynchronization Signal Block, in 5G PBCH and synchronization signal are packaged as a single block subordinate\tThe term \u201csubordinate\u201d is used as a replacement for \u201cslave\u201d and is consistent with its use in CUS specification. When consensus emerges on how to eliminate the use of the term \u201cslave\u201d in the referenced standards organization, that approach will be applied to this specification sudo\tSuper-User Do role S-Plane\tSynchronization Plane: Data flow for synchronization and timing information between nodes SyncE\tSynchronous Ethernet, is an ITU-T standard for computer networking that facilitates distribution of clock signals over the Ethernet physical layer T-BC\tTelecom Boundary Clock TWAMP\tTwo-Way Active Measurement Protocol UDP\tUser Datagram Protocol UE\tUser Equipment terminology for a mobile device in LTE and NR UL\tUpLink: data flow from the UE towards the core network, that is from the O-RU towards in the O-DU in a Fronthaul context. Abbreviations For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply. C-Plane\tControl Plane: refers specifically to real-time control between O-DU and O-RU, and should not be confused with the UE\u2019s control plane CUSM-E\tC-Plane, U-Plane, S-Plane and M-plane emulator \u2013 test equipment capable of sending and receiving required messages for all of these protocol planes when the Radio Unit is the device under test DL\tDownLink: data flow towards the radiating antenna DUT\tDevice Under Test eNB\te NodeB (applies to LTE) <E-UTRAN NodeB / Evolved NodeB> gNB\tg NodeB (applies to NR) <Next Generation NodeB> M-Plane\tManagement Plane: refers to non-real-time management operations between the O-DU and the O-RU NETCONF\tNetwork Configuration Protocol. For details see RFC 6241, \u201cNetwork Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)\u201d, IETF, June 2011 SMO\tService Management and Orchestration O-DU\tO-RAN Distributed Unit <O-RAN Distributed Unit: a logical node hosting PDCP/RLC/MAC/High-PHY layers based on a lower layer functional split.> O-RU\tO-RAN Radio Unit <O-RAN Radio Unit: a logical node hosting Low-PHY layer and RF processing based on a lower layer functional split. This is similar to 3GPP\u2019s \u201cTRP\u201d or \u201cRRH\u201d but more specific in including the Low-PHY layer (FFT/iFFT, PRACH extraction).> S-Plane\tSynchronization Plane: refers to traffic between the O-RU or O-DU to a synchronization controller which is generally an IEEE-1588 Grand Master (however, Grand Master functionality may be embedded in the O-DU). TED\tTest Equipment, O-DU \u2013 test equipment used to validate the O-DU TER\tTest Equipment, O-RU \u2013 test equipment used to validate the O-RU UL\tUpLink: data flow away from the radiating antenna U-Plane\tUser Plane: refers to IQ sample data transferred between O-DU and O-RU Test Configuration The conformance tests described in this document require test equipment with specific capabilities to support the testing of each protocol including the M-Plane, U-Plane, C-Plane and S-Plane. In addition, the tests define a specific connectivity between the test equipment and the device under test. This clause describes the test equipment requirements at a high level. Details are included in each test. As noted in the introduction in the Scope paragraphs, the initial focus of the M-Plane, C-Plane and U-Plane conformance tests is the O-RU. Version 2.00 and later include S-Plane tests for the O-DU in addition to the S-Plane tests for the O-RU. The initial test configuration description below is focused on the test equipment and configuration required to test the O-RU. O-DU test configuration descriptions for the S-Plane are covered in the S-Plane clause of this document. Test Configuration for O-RU as the Device Under Test", "document": "/home/jvamaraju/oran-chatbot-multimodal/vectorstore/oran/O-RAN.WG4.CONF.0-R003-v09.00.docx", "gt_answer": "S-Plane, in the context of O-RAN specifications, refers to traffic between the O-RU or O-DU to a synchronization controller which is generally an IEEE-1588 Grand Master.", "question": "What is the meaning of S-Plane in the context of O-RAN specifications?", "answer": "In the context of O-RAN specifications, the S-Plane refers to the control plane of the radio access network (RAN). The S-Plane is responsible for managing the control and signaling functions of the RAN, including radio resource management, mobility management, and security functions.\n\nThe S-Plane is designed to be flexible and modular, allowing for the decoupling of the control functions from the user plane functions. This decoupling enables the use of different vendors for the control and user plane functions, which is a key aspect of the O-RAN architecture.\n\nThe S-Plane is defined by a set of interfaces and protocols that allow for communication between the various components of the RAN. These interfaces include the F1 interface, which connects the base station to the core network, and the E1 interface, which connects the base station to the radio unit.\n\nThe S-Plane also includes a set of functional components, such as the Radio Resource Management (RRM) function, which is responsible for managing the radio resources of the RAN, and the Mobility Management Entity (MME), which is responsible for managing the mobility of user equipment within the RAN.\n\nOverall, the S-Plane is a critical component of the O-RAN architecture, providing the control and signaling functions necessary for the operation of the RAN.", "contexts": []}]