You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to note that one of the most frustrating things about having discussions with LLMs about LARQL and related topics is constantly having to deal with them starting arguments and fights for no apparent reason when I try to talk about the fact that LLMs are graph databases.
This is no where in their training data, rarely in the RAG corpus that they have access to, and LARQL is so obscure at this moment that it is virtually indexed nowhere and invisible or suppressed by the existing systems.
Anyone else have issues with LLMs getting weirdly defensive or argumentative about the claim that "LLMs are graph databases + restricted query languages"?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I want to note that one of the most frustrating things about having discussions with LLMs about LARQL and related topics is constantly having to deal with them starting arguments and fights for no apparent reason when I try to talk about the fact that LLMs are graph databases.
This is no where in their training data, rarely in the RAG corpus that they have access to, and LARQL is so obscure at this moment that it is virtually indexed nowhere and invisible or suppressed by the existing systems.
Anyone else have issues with LLMs getting weirdly defensive or argumentative about the claim that "LLMs are graph databases + restricted query languages"?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions