You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
We're using the stackdriver exporter, and it looks like there is some kind of mismatch in the formatting of the stack trace data.
We get this kind of messy output:
I'm not sure what exactly is up there. It might be a snake_case vs camelCase thing. i.e. stackFrames vs stack_frames.
We're currently working around it by reducing default_max_stack_frames, since otherwise some attributes may get pushed below the scrollable portion of the page.
I believe having proper formatting of the stack traces would greatly improve the UX here.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
igorwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
changed the title
stack trace is not formatted correctly in stackdriver
Stack trace is not formatted correctly in stackdriver
May 14, 2018
Thanks for the report. I've verified that the exporter is sending the correct protobuf, and so I've forwarded this to the Stackdriver UI team (internal bug 80152470).
Hi!
We're using the stackdriver exporter, and it looks like there is some kind of mismatch in the formatting of the stack trace data.
We get this kind of messy output:
I'm not sure what exactly is up there. It might be a snake_case vs camelCase thing. i.e.
stackFrames
vsstack_frames
.We're currently working around it by reducing
default_max_stack_frames
, since otherwise some attributes may get pushed below the scrollable portion of the page.I believe having proper formatting of the stack traces would greatly improve the UX here.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: