Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

can ytt auto-explain why overlay matching did not match expected number of nodes #503

Open
cppforlife opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion This issue is not a bug or feature and a conversation is needed to find an appropriate resolution enhancement This issue is a feature request

Comments

@cppforlife
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem/challenge you have
Users may run into a challenge determining why their overlay does not match expected number of nodes. (e.g. if overlay.subset({"apiVersion": "cert-manager.io/v1"}) but the actual node has cert-manager.io/v1alpha1). it would be interesting to somehow let the user know potential nodes that were "almost" matched.

no clue how to implement this.


Vote on this request

This is an invitation to the community to vote on issues, to help us prioritize our backlog. Use the "smiley face" up to the right of this comment to vote.

👍 "I would like to see this addressed as soon as possible"
👎 "There are other more important things to focus on right now"

We are also happy to receive and review Pull Requests if you want to help working on this issue.

@cppforlife cppforlife added enhancement This issue is a feature request carvel triage This issue has not yet been triaged for relevance labels Oct 8, 2021
@cppforlife cppforlife changed the title can ytt explain why overlay matching does not match expected number of nodes can ytt auto-explain why overlay matching does not match expected number of nodes Oct 8, 2021
@cppforlife cppforlife changed the title can ytt auto-explain why overlay matching does not match expected number of nodes can ytt auto-explain why overlay matching did not match expected number of nodes Oct 8, 2021
@pivotaljohn pivotaljohn added discussion This issue is not a bug or feature and a conversation is needed to find an appropriate resolution and removed carvel triage This issue has not yet been triaged for relevance labels Oct 8, 2021
@pivotaljohn
Copy link
Contributor

Perhaps a fuzzy match? Like, "did you mean ?"

@cppforlife
Copy link
Contributor Author

yeah, but how do we implement something like that. matchers could be arbitrarily complex in their logic (and we do not know what it is). does this only makes to try to implement for builtin matchers?

@aaronshurley aaronshurley moved this to To Triage in Carvel Aug 18, 2022
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To Triage in Carvel Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion This issue is not a bug or feature and a conversation is needed to find an appropriate resolution enhancement This issue is a feature request
Projects
Status: To Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants