You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As per subject: very simple TikZ figures will break --pictureimages because \lxSVG@closescope does not disappear from the reversion. I am not planning to use --pictureimages, I am just trying to understand how pgfsys-latexml.def is supposed to be written. I gather that the intention is for the @tex tag to rebuild an equivalent output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue reminds me that we had an internal discussion in the past that the reversions we get for pgf figures can be a bit too low-level. The context back then was that when texlive versions change, the reverted attributes have unpredictable diffs (due to internal library code getting refactored) even if the outer pgf/tikz figure remains the same. Which makes it hard to test such figures in CI, as they would need a different test target for each texlive.
All that to say, maybe we would benefit from having a higher-level reversion for pgf/tikz figures, that is collected before any/most expansion takes place.
As per subject: very simple TikZ figures will break --pictureimages because
\lxSVG@closescope
does not disappear from the reversion. I am not planning to use --pictureimages, I am just trying to understand how pgfsys-latexml.def is supposed to be written. I gather that the intention is for the@tex
tag to rebuild an equivalent output.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: