Skip to content

How does Vorta compare to Bup/Kup and BackInTime? Please add a comparison of features/functionality #705

Description

@mYnDstrEAm

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I couldn't find a clear and useful comparison of Borg/Vorta with Bup/the Qt GUI Kup and BackInTime. These seem to be the three best FOSS backup software with a Qt GUI. Such a comparison would be useful for:

  • users to find out whether Vorta is the adequate and/or best solution
  • other developers to identify which Vorta features to add to their software
  • developers of Vorta to identify which features other similar software has but Vorta lacks so that it can be added to make Vorta the best solution, allowing for all functionality of other software

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be good if a separate website and/or the Vorta website had a comparison of functionality/features of Vorta in direct comparison with (at least) these two other software. This comparison should probably be linked to either directly from "Why is this great?" in the readme or be findable at the link in "Learn more on Vorta's website."

Maybe this would be more appropriate at https://github.com/borgbase/docs.borgbase.com

  • BackInTime is great software but its development currently seems to be inactive. I suggested Vorta as an alternative to it here: Backintime Dead: Alternative? bit-team/backintime#1092 (comment) I'm mostly interested in how Vorta differs from it and which features BackInTime offers that Vorta currently does not have.
  • Kup is a Qt GUI for Bup and it seems to integrate nicely into KDE and, unlike Vorta, is in Debian's repos. However Bup isn't in the repos of latest Debian (only in older versions).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions