Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spatial groupings: Watersheds, Ecoregions, Counties #10

Open
cboettig opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Spatial groupings: Watersheds, Ecoregions, Counties #10

cboettig opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@cboettig
Copy link
Member

One class of questions I keep getting asked about involves comparisons with various spatial tilings of the entire map: ecoregions, counties, watersheds. Users ask questions like:

  • Which ecoregions/counties/watersheds has the highest/lowest level of biodiversity/carbon/social vulnerability,
  • How are protections distributed over ecoregions/counties/watersheds?

I think it would be great to brainstorm ways we might approach this question, with what we can pre-calculate and what we might be able to calculate dynamically.

An added wrinkle is that most of these tiling are hierarchical -- e.g. states->counties->tracks, ecoregions->subregions etc.
In an idealized version of the tool, users could both filter to a jurisdiction of interest, and then quickly explore the distribution questions (i.e., within my state, which counties are highest in biodiversity/carbon/nature vulnerability. Or same question but state->county and county-> tract, etc).

I believe most of these are fast aggregations if we compute the spatial joins and raster zonal statistics ahead of time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant