|
| 1 | +# Ghostty-Web Spike |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Date: 2026-03-24 |
| 4 | +Branch: `experiment/ghostty-web-spike` |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## Problem Statement |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +TermCanvas currently embeds terminals with xterm.js. We have spent a long time |
| 9 | +fighting scroll behavior during streaming AI CLI output, especially for Codex |
| 10 | +and Claude sessions with sustained output. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +The most painful user-visible failure mode right now is: |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +1. User scrolls upward to read previous output. |
| 15 | +2. User reaches the top of the visible scrollback. |
| 16 | +3. The viewport is forcibly snapped back to the live bottom. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +This is not acceptable behavior for a terminal reader. It breaks trust in the |
| 19 | +viewport and makes long-running agent sessions hard to inspect. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +There is also a second class of historical pain around scroll-pinning under |
| 22 | +heavy output: once scrollback fills and trimming begins, xterm.js internal |
| 23 | +scroll state can drift in ways that are difficult to reason about and have led |
| 24 | +to multiple local patches. Those patches have themselves become a source of |
| 25 | +regression risk. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## Current Understanding |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +The immediate snap-to-bottom bug appears to be caused by our own xterm.js |
| 30 | +patching layer, not by a mandatory xterm.js default behavior. Specifically, |
| 31 | +`src/terminal/TerminalTile.tsx` contains custom scroll recovery logic that tries |
| 32 | +to detect a "stuck at top during trimming" state and calls |
| 33 | +`scrollToBottom()`. In normal user scroll-to-top cases, that heuristic is too |
| 34 | +broad and misfires. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +Even if that specific bug is fixed, the larger concern remains: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- We are relying on xterm.js internals and private state. |
| 39 | +- We already maintain custom behavior around scroll, selection, serialization, |
| 40 | + WebGL, and terminal restore. |
| 41 | +- Scroll semantics under streaming output have been fragile enough to consume |
| 42 | + significant debugging time. |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +Because of that, we want to evaluate whether a different terminal frontend |
| 45 | +foundation would reduce long-term complexity. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Spike Goal |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Evaluate whether `ghostty-web` is a credible replacement for xterm.js in |
| 50 | +TermCanvas. |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +This spike is not approved as a full migration. It is a bounded experiment to |
| 53 | +answer whether switching foundations is realistic and whether it improves the |
| 54 | +specific user experience problems that have been expensive to maintain on |
| 55 | +xterm.js. |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +## Primary Goals |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +1. Stand up a minimal `ghostty-web` terminal tile inside TermCanvas. |
| 60 | +2. Confirm that we can render PTY output in the existing React/Electron |
| 61 | + architecture. |
| 62 | +3. Test whether scrolling behavior during sustained AI CLI streaming is more |
| 63 | + predictable than our current xterm.js setup. |
| 64 | +4. Measure the migration surface area for the features we already depend on. |
| 65 | +5. Decide whether full migration is worth pursuing, or whether fixing xterm.js |
| 66 | + locally is still the better path. |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +## Non-Goals |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +This spike should not attempt to fully ship a new terminal stack. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +Specifically out of scope: |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +- complete production migration |
| 75 | +- parity for every existing terminal feature |
| 76 | +- unrelated UI cleanup |
| 77 | +- changing PTY backend architecture |
| 78 | +- solving every historical xterm.js issue during the spike |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +## What We Need To Learn |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +### 1. Integration Feasibility |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +- Can `ghostty-web` run cleanly in our Electron renderer? |
| 85 | +- What initialization/runtime requirements does it impose? |
| 86 | +- Does it fit our current terminal lifecycle model? |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +### 2. Feature Parity Gaps |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +We currently depend on: |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +- terminal fitting on resize |
| 93 | +- scrollback restore / serialization |
| 94 | +- theme switching |
| 95 | +- selection + copy behavior |
| 96 | +- direct key handling |
| 97 | +- inline image support |
| 98 | +- GPU-accelerated rendering path |
| 99 | +- focus management |
| 100 | +- terminal buffer inspection for viewport state |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +The spike needs to identify which of these are: |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +- supported directly |
| 105 | +- available via different APIs |
| 106 | +- available only through custom adaptation |
| 107 | +- missing or impractical |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +### 3. Scroll Behavior |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +The spike must explicitly test: |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +- user scroll-up during streaming output |
| 114 | +- reaching top of scrollback |
| 115 | +- staying away from bottom while output continues |
| 116 | +- behavior once scrollback becomes large |
| 117 | +- whether any forced snap-to-bottom or unexpected drift still appears |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### 4. Migration Cost |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +We need an honest estimate of: |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +- how much of `TerminalTile.tsx` would need replacement |
| 124 | +- whether our xterm-specific addons have equivalents |
| 125 | +- whether custom compatibility glue would offset any benefits |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +## Success Criteria For The Spike |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +The spike is successful if, by the end, we have: |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +1. A working experimental terminal path using `ghostty-web`. |
| 132 | +2. A written comparison of xterm.js vs `ghostty-web` for TermCanvas needs. |
| 133 | +3. A clear answer on whether migration should proceed. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +## Decision Criteria |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +We should consider migration only if most of the following are true: |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +- scroll behavior is materially better |
| 140 | +- the integration is stable enough for our Electron app |
| 141 | +- missing features are limited and manageable |
| 142 | +- custom compatibility glue is smaller than the complexity we are trying to |
| 143 | + escape |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +We should stop and stay on xterm.js if: |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +- `ghostty-web` still requires heavy patching for our use cases |
| 148 | +- feature gaps are large |
| 149 | +- performance or correctness regresses |
| 150 | +- the migration cost is high relative to simply fixing the current bug |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +## Immediate Next Step |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +Build a minimal experimental terminal component on this branch that can: |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +- initialize `ghostty-web` |
| 157 | +- attach to a DOM container |
| 158 | +- stream PTY output |
| 159 | +- accept keyboard input |
| 160 | +- expose enough behavior to manually test scroll semantics |
0 commit comments