Unmatched species

[mathieuLU]

Ecodata/BioCollect and the Lists components are based on the scientific names of species to match the elements.
Which means that if a scientific name is not provided in the species list, or misspelled, it won't be matched with other GBIF occurences.
And then the element will be labelled as " Unrecognised taxa " in the lists module, and it won't be possible to use it in BioCollect/Ecodata

In SEBMS for instance, Lars is using a lot of aggregates taxon names. No scientific names for them.

In Ecodata, if a user creates a row with a new name (non-existing in the species list), the row is "successfully saved" with this new name. But the record won't be create. Data exists in the output collection though.

Several questions :

• how to deal with the aggregate species for the LISTS module
• is it allowed to add a row with unknon species in SFT/SEBMS forms ? (no ideas what are Lars/Åke' views on this subject)
• shall I address Sathish/Peter on that subject?

[mathieuLU]

All the taxa are recognized. The remaining problem is about the species-aggregate in SEBMS