We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We have a separate implementation for OpenAI because LiteLLM could not go above 50 RPS, but they seem to have fixed the issue BerriAI/litellm#6592.
We should test this out, if we can reach 500 RPS with LiteLLM then we can deprecate OpenAI backend
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On the other hand, LiteLLM also has some performance issues, so maybe we shouldn't do this.....
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ok, consensus seems to be that we should keep relying on our own OpenAI backend code...
No branches or pull requests
We have a separate implementation for OpenAI because LiteLLM could not go above 50 RPS, but they seem to have fixed the issue BerriAI/litellm#6592.
We should test this out, if we can reach 500 RPS with LiteLLM then we can deprecate OpenAI backend
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: