You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to implement the Helmholtz problem in your paper. I tried many times in the basic PINNs, and the prediction is different from the publication, even in the lowest wave number case. After going through your partial code, I found that it might not be consistent with the definition of scalar problem parameters, k and sigma, as well as the source term, in the paper.
Could you please help me clarify the correct definition of the governing equation? The figure 9 is indeed an attractive picture that I want to explore. Thank you very much!
Best,
Qifeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To whom it may concern,
I am trying to implement the Helmholtz problem in your paper. I tried many times in the basic PINNs, and the prediction is different from the publication, even in the lowest wave number case. After going through your partial code, I found that it might not be consistent with the definition of scalar problem parameters, k and sigma, as well as the source term, in the paper.
Could you please help me clarify the correct definition of the governing equation? The figure 9 is indeed an attractive picture that I want to explore. Thank you very much!
Best,
Qifeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: