Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
What a well-written, well-thought out proposal. Makes wonderful sense to me, and having the ability to chose which migration approach makes sense for the deployment is quite nice. I agree that the current approach is great for single machine deployments, but multi-server and multi-region would benefit from an approach like this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
@rubys Thanks for kicking this discussion off. I will read and absorb what you're proposing and reply thoughtfully as soon as I can. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I apologize in advance if this is already in the plan and I missed it, or if it has been considered and rejected, but these are features I will need to take advantage of this new gem. I wrote up my thoughts here: https://intertwingly.net/blog/2025/10/06/Geo-Aware-Lazy-Migrations.html
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions