Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Support for AWS Aurora PostgreSQL with PgVector (serverless) as an alternative to AWS OpenSearch Serverless in the version 2 #608

Open
containeers opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@containeers
Copy link

Describe the solution you'd like

Support for AWS Aurora PostgreSQL with PgVector (serverless) as an alternative to AWS OpenSearch Serverless in the version 2 architecture. This solution would leverage the PgVector extension to enable vector search directly within the Aurora PostgreSQL serverless database. It offers a cost-effective

Why the solution needed

Cost Efficiency: AWS Aurora PostgreSQL serverless with PgVector significantly reduces costs compared to maintaining a separate AWS OpenSearch Serverless infrastructure. Aurora allows on-demand scaling, reducing costs during low usage periods while meeting scalability requirements during high-demand times.
Simplified Architecture & Cloud Native database.

Additional context

PgVector: PgVector is an open-source extension for PostgreSQL designed for efficient similarity searches on high-dimensional vectors, commonly used in AI/ML-driven applications.

[PgVector GitHub Repository](https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector)
[AWS Aurora PostgreSQL PgVector support announcement (if available)](https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/...)

Cost Comparison:

Aurora PostgreSQL Serverless + PgVector offers reduced costs compared to OpenSearch Serverless, particularly for smaller-scale applications or those with intermittent usage patterns.
Operational overhead is reduced, as Aurora PostgreSQL serverless requires less tuning and management compared to maintaining a dedicated OpenSearch cluster.

Implementation feasibility

Are you willing to collaborate with us to discuss the solution, decide on the approach, and assist with the implementation?
No, I am unable to implement the feature, but I am open to discussing the solution.

@statefb statefb added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 24, 2024
wontagh pushed a commit to aroundble/bedrock-claude-chat that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
* Update Cloud9 setup instruction

Update Cloud9 setup instruction to clone repo prior to resizing the volume

* Update docs/guide/deploy.md

Co-authored-by: Charles Marion <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Marion <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants