-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extend the Response Action schema to facilitate additional information #344
Comments
Hello @pjabes , @xofolowski! Thank you for your continuous contribution! The |
Excellent work as always team. Would a dictionary allow for multiple values to be captured against each field? Could the value of a dict entry be a list? A use case for a custom details field would be
Another use cause could be to capture the automation endpoints used for RA's that are automated for similar use cases. |
@d3anp - that shouldn't be a problem at all. For example, you could have in your yaml
In your jinja template, you could then just add a section, let's say "requirements", draw a table and for the cell containing "privileges" just iterate over the list contained in details['requires']['privileges']. HTH |
Another idea that just pops into my mind: Doing so would make it way easier to benefit from upstream RE&CT repository updates, since merging into my own instance wouldn't cause too much pain as any custom details wouldn't be affected by upstream changes. What do you think? Would it be worth to spend some efforts on that? |
Presently, a given Response Action will render a page with the following fields
title
,id
,description
,author
,creation_date
,stage
,references
,workflow
. Various stakeholders have requested the ability to add additional information into a response action to enrich the value that it provides to analysts.By way of an example, given RA2602 - Remove User Account of a compromised service account may result in an unintended impact to the business. Some SOCs may want to tag this action with some further details specifying the rating of business impact that could potentially occur.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: