return cspm tests

[jnathangreeg]

PR Type

Tests

---

Description

• Removed unused return statement in start method of cspm.py.

• Simplified the start method for better readability.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Tests	cspm.py Remove unused return statement in `start` method                  tests_scripts/accounts/cspm.py Removed an unused return statement in the start method. Improved code clarity by eliminating redundant code. +0/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Early Return The removed early return statement with success status could have been intentional for test validation. Verify that removing this return doesn't affect test behavior and validation flow. assert self.backend is not None, f'the test {self.test_driver.test_name} must run with backend'

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Use secure random number generation Consider using a more secure random number generation method like secrets.randbelow() for generating account names, as random.randint() is not cryptographically secure and could be predictable. tests_scripts/accounts/cspm.py [60] -rand = str(random.randint(10000000, 99999999)) +rand = str(secrets.randbelow(89999999) + 10000000) Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using cryptographically secure random number generation (secrets module) instead of random.randint() is a significant security improvement, especially when generating unique account identifiers that could be potentially exploited if predictable.	8

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR