[Feat Req] adding support for typst

[NeutrinoLiu]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

arXiv currently doesn't support Typst compilation, requiring authors to submit pre-compiled PDFs rather than source files. While PDF submission works, it prevents leveraging arXiv's source-based archival benefits that TeX/LaTeX users enjoy.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add Typst as a supported compilation format alongside existing TeX/LaTeX processors. Authors could submit .typ source files with arXiv compiling them server-side using the open-source Typst compiler, similar to how LaTeX submissions currently work.

Why Typst deserves support:

Typst has shown strong adoption since its March 2023 release:

• 45,000+ GitHub stars and 350+ contributors on the compiler

Technical feasibility:

• Open-source (Apache-2.0 license) with active maintenance
• Deterministic, reproducible compilation
• Single binary with minimal dependencies
• Already proven stable in large-scale production environments

This aligns well with arXiv's recent modernization efforts

Describe alternatives you've considered

• Submit PDF only: Works but loses source-based archival benefits
• Maintain parallel LaTeX version: Creates maintenance burden and version drift risks
• Convert to LaTeX: No reliable automated tools; manual conversion defeats the purpose

Additional context

Supporting Typst would future-proof arXiv's infrastructure for next-generation typesetting tools while maintaining source-based archival for a rapidly growing user base. Given Typst's adoption trajectory and arXiv's recent willingness to add new processors (XeLaTeX), native Typst support would be a natural next step.

[dginev]

@NeutrinoLiu could you motivate this also from an arXiv author's perspective? I am curious if you can point us to academic articles you yourself have written with Typst and may have wanted to submit to arXiv. We are aware of Typst's momentum but it would be nice to understand author demand a little better.

Separately, I am curious about the maturity of the ongoing HTML export effort, as it would be nice to also provide HTML as a supported format for (hypothetical) new authoring languages.

[NeutrinoLiu]

@NeutrinoLiu could you motivate this also from an arXiv author's perspective? I am curious if you can point us to academic articles you yourself have written with Typst and may have wanted to submit to arXiv. We are aware of Typst's momentum but it would be nice to understand author demand a little better.

Separately, I am curious about the maturity of the ongoing HTML export effort, as it would be nice to also provide HTML as a supported format for (hypothetical) new authoring languages.

Hi dginev, I can speak to this from direct experience as a Typst user. I've authored two arXiv papers in Typst: one published submission and another recent submission currently under review.

The main limitation I've encountered with PDF-only upload is the absence of arXiv's watermark on the first page (the "arXiv:XXXX.XXXXX" identifier in the left margin). While this isn't critical for my immediate needs, it does represent a gap in the submission workflow compared to LaTeX sources.

Regarding HTML export: while I haven't used it extensively myself, I see some value in having structured HTML output. It would provide a better foundation for indexing services, citation tools, and accessibility features to extract paper contents and semantic structure more reliably than from PDFs alone.

[dgomezcastro]

@NeutrinoLiu could you motivate this also from an arXiv author's perspective? I am curious if you can point us to academic articles you yourself have written with Typst and may have wanted to submit to arXiv. We are aware of Typst's momentum but it would be nice to understand author demand a little better.

I am mathematician working in academia. I am well versed in LaTeX, and I taught the LaTeX course for Science students at my university: https://github.com/dgomezcastro/UAM-LaTeX

I have been using typst to write lecture notes and other documents for a while and find it superior to LaTeX for almost all applications. I would really like to be also able to write my papers in typst, but I will not be able to do it until journals allow it. There are workarounds like uploading PDF-only, but having "first-class citizen" support would be very significant in swaying the big publishers.

Apparently the arxiv maintainers are considering typst support, see the contribution of one of the maintainers in the typst meetup in February