[C++] Prospects of SVE based optimizations #46762
chiranmoyf
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
It's acceptable if we can maintain. See also: #46002 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
-
Hand-written SIMD optimizations should almost always use xsimd.
How did you come to this conclusion ("many functions utilizing NEON"?). NEON is enabled by default when compiling for ARM/ARM64, but we have very few hand-written optimizations. So this might simply be code vectorized by the compiler. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Are SIMD optimizations with regard to SVE acceptable by the community?
I see that there are many functions utilizing NEON while benchmarking but barely any that use SVE.
There are lots of functions using, and in turn utilizing SSE, AVX and NEON, but not for SVE.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions