Hello! I'm using this library for one of my projects, as well as attempting to make an SDL3 frontend for lem. In order to avoid unnecessary consing/gc pressure, I use the underlying cffi functions and structs directly a lot of the time. I think the % prefix is already good enough indicator that it's the low-level cffi version without needing to make them private. The only inconsistency I find is that cffi slots don't have the % prefix, but the functions do. That's a minor issue though.
Do you think it would make sense to export them alongside the high level functions? I can make these changes.
Hello! I'm using this library for one of my projects, as well as attempting to make an SDL3 frontend for lem. In order to avoid unnecessary consing/gc pressure, I use the underlying cffi functions and structs directly a lot of the time. I think the % prefix is already good enough indicator that it's the low-level cffi version without needing to make them private. The only inconsistency I find is that cffi slots don't have the % prefix, but the functions do. That's a minor issue though.
Do you think it would make sense to export them alongside the high level functions? I can make these changes.