Skip to content

[ refactor ] Fix/rationalise 'legacy' binder names in Relation.Binary.Definitions (and elsewhere?) #2547

Open
@jamesmckinna

Description

@jamesmckinna

Seeing #2546 made me realise that I personally can no longer tolerate the inconsistency between the use of x (in Reflexive), x and y (in Symmetric), but i j and k in Relation.Binary.Definitions.Transitive.

We should fix this in v3.0, IMNSVHO. What other such horrors are lurking out there?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions