Hello @ganadist. Thank you for your report. We'll take a look at this feature request.

Hello, Thank you for your feature request. While supporting non-Ubuntu Linux distributions could be beneficial, it introduces added complexity, increases maintenance overhead, and could lead to misconfigurations. We believe that focusing on a single, consistent platform ensures a more stable and reliable experience for most users. As per our support policy, we only support versions available on our hosted runners. This ensures a more consistent and reliable experience across all environments.We appreciate your understanding and encourage you to share any further ideas in the future.

Hello Everyone, Please let us know in case of clarifications needed on the above.

As per our support policy, we only support versions available on our hosted runners. This ensures a more consistent and reliable experience across all environments. We appreciate your understanding and encourage you to share any further ideas in the future.

Thanks for the clarification.

My actual request was not about providing binary distribution for non-Ubuntu Linux.
But my request was suggestion how about providing small extension to specify customized manifest to use setup-python on non-Ubuntu Linux.

This itself doesn't take much effort, and if anyone use it at their own risk, it would be easy and useful on non-Ubuntu Linux distribution.

Hello @ganadist, We appreciate your feedback regarding the potential for a customized manifest option for setup-python on non-Ubuntu Linux distributions. As per our support policy, we currently only support versions available on our hosted runners. However, we’ll certainly keep your suggestion in mind for future updates once support for non-Ubuntu Linux distributions is added to our hosted runners.

For now, we’ll proceed to close the issue, but please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions or concerns. We also encourage you to share any additional ideas in the future.