feat: Hyperliquid exchange interfacing #2694
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bennett <[email protected]>
bmzig
requested review from
dohaki,
mrice32,
nicholaspai and
pxrl
as code owners
pxrl
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Like binance, it's likely most expedient to piggy back off of an existing sdk. I chose
@nktkas/hyperliquidsince it seems to be the most actively developed among the suggested SDKs here https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api.This also adds some retry wrappers to some InfoClient functions, which will presumably be the ones to retry (although we can trivially add retries to any exchange functions, too).