diff --git a/packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/deep-interview/SKILL.md b/packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/deep-interview/SKILL.md
index 4352974c58..21c7f2e50f 100644
--- a/packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/deep-interview/SKILL.md
+++ b/packages/coding-agent/src/defaults/gjc/skills/deep-interview/SKILL.md
@@ -601,15 +601,20 @@ To dispute: send `{ "id": "<fact-id>", "disputed": true }`. To supersede: send `
 
 **`write --input`** — same `{"state":{…}}` shape and same merge semantics as a staged `merge-state` apply, committed in one step. `write --reset --input` replaces the whole `state` with the payload (the locked `intent_contract` is re-attached automatically); use it only for deliberate re-initialization.
 
-### Step 2f: Check Tiered Confirmation Cadence
+### Step 2f: Check Continuation Contract (issue #4589)
 
-Confirmation cadence is tiered by round, adopted from ouroboros's ooo interview, while the hard safety cap is retained:
+An ordinary answered round NEVER asks for generic continuation approval. After scoring, persisting the round, and reporting progress, continue directly to the next weakest-dimension question until a legitimate terminal condition occurs. Generic "continue?"-style or continue/cancel/clear choices are NOT interview-round prompts; surfacing a generic continuation ask after an ordinary answered round converts the ambiguity gate into per-answer consent friction and is a contract violation.
 
-- **Rounds 1-3 (auto-continue)**: minimum context gathering — proceed to the next question without a "continue?" prompt.
-- **Rounds 4-15 (ask to continue)**: after each round, ask "Continue, or proceed with current clarity ({score}%)?" so the user controls depth.
-- **Rounds 16+ (diminishing-returns warning)**: keep asking "Continue?" but prefix a diminishing-returns warning: "We're at {n} rounds (ambiguity: {score}%); each further round yields less. Continue or proceed?"
-- **Round 3+ early exit**: still allow immediate exit if the user says "enough", "let's go", "build it".
-- **Round 100 (hard cap)**: "Maximum interview rounds reached. Proceeding with current clarity level ({score}%)." The tiered cadence never removes this hard safety cap.
+Legitimate terminal conditions — the ONLY places the interview may stop or ask about stopping:
+
+1. **Threshold + closure gates**: ambiguity ≤ the resolved threshold AND the Phase 4 closure audit and one-sentence Restate gate have passed. Then crystallize the spec and present the Phase 5 execution options.
+2. **Explicit user exit**: preserve the two exit-intent classes in any session language:
+   - **Hard cancellation**: "stop", "cancel", "abort", or equivalent stops immediately at any round and saves state for resume. Never turn a hard cancellation into a clarifying question.
+   - **Early proceed**: "enough", "let's go", "build it", or equivalent stops with the early-exit warning from round 3+ when ambiguity > threshold. Before round 3, ask one targeted clarifying question about what the user wants changed instead; do not treat that early-proceed intent as a hard cancellation.
+3. **Invocation/resume suitability ambiguity only**: the Phase 0.5 continue/cancel/clear choice exists solely at the invocation boundary when existing state already contains rounds, topology, spec, or handoff metadata. It is never re-asked inside an active interview.
+4. **Bounded continuation safety recovery**: the Round 100 hard cap ("Maximum interview rounds reached. Proceeding with current clarity level ({score}%).") or the runtime's bounded continuation budget being exhausted. These are safety stops, not consent prompts.
+
+The user always keeps passive exit control: any answer, option, or free-text reply can carry an exit intent. Hard cancellations are honored immediately; early-proceed intents follow their round-3 safety rule above. Depth control comes from answering the questions themselves or exiting explicitly — not from per-round continue? interruptions.
 
 ## Phase 3: Lateral Review Panel (milestone-triggered)
 
@@ -957,7 +962,7 @@ Why bad: 45% ambiguity means nearly half the requirements are unclear. The mathe
 
 <Escalation_And_Stop_Conditions>
 - **Hard cap at 100 rounds**: Proceed with whatever clarity exists, noting the risk
-- **Tiered confirmation cadence**: rounds 1-3 auto-continue, rounds 4-15 ask to continue, rounds 16+ ask with a diminishing-returns warning
+- **Continuation contract**: ordinary answered rounds auto-continue to the next weakest-dimension question with no generic continue/cancel/clear ask; stopping is reserved for threshold + closure gates, explicit user exit, invocation/resume suitability, or bounded safety recovery
 - **Early exit (round 3+)**: Allow with warning if ambiguity > threshold
 - **User says "stop", "cancel", "abort"**: Stop immediately, save state for resume
 - **Ambiguity stalls** (same score +-0.05 for 3 rounds): Activate Ontologist mode to reframe
@@ -976,6 +981,7 @@ Why bad: 45% ambiguity means nearly half the requirements are unclear. The mathe
 - [ ] Free-text answers passed the Refine gate; dialectic rhythm guard forced a user question after 3 agent-resolved answers; any auto-answer threshold crossing explicitly confirmed
 - [ ] Closure / Acceptance Guard and the one-sentence Restate gate both passed before crystallization
 - [ ] Interview reached ambiguity ≤ threshold OR an explicit early exit with warning
+- [ ] Ordinary answered rounds auto-continued to the next weakest-dimension question with no generic continue/cancel/clear ask; any stop matched a legitimate terminal condition (threshold + closure gates, explicit user exit, invocation/resume suitability, or bounded safety recovery)
 - [ ] Spec persisted to `.gjc/_session-{sessionid}/specs/deep-interview-{slug}.md` exactly via the GJC CLI (no direct `.gjc/` edits without force override), covering every active topology component plus goal/constraints/acceptance criteria/clarity/ontology/transcript
 - [ ] Spec metadata includes the auto/lateral counters (`auto_researched_rounds`, `auto_answered_rounds`, `lateral_reviews`, `refined_rounds`, `architect_failures`, `lateral_panel_failures`)
 - [ ] Execution bridge presented via `ask`; execution invoked only after explicit approval through a public workflow entrypoint (never direct implementation); state cleaned up after handoff
diff --git a/packages/coding-agent/test/agent-session-deep-interview-continuation.test.ts b/packages/coding-agent/test/agent-session-deep-interview-continuation.test.ts
index 1dc08ed87f..e9497331e8 100644
--- a/packages/coding-agent/test/agent-session-deep-interview-continuation.test.ts
+++ b/packages/coding-agent/test/agent-session-deep-interview-continuation.test.ts
@@ -564,6 +564,79 @@ describe("AgentSession deep-interview continuation", () => {
 			),
 		);
 	});
+	it("auto-continues an ordinary answered round past the retired tier boundary without a generic continuation approval ask (#4589)", async () => {
+		await activateWorkflow("deep-interview");
+		// Round 6 sits inside the retired "rounds 4-15 ask to continue" band; an
+		// ordinary answered round there must still auto-continue the interview
+		// (score, persist, next weakest-dimension question) instead of surfacing a
+		// generic continue/cancel/clear choice.
+		const ask = new AskTool({
+			cwd: tempDir.path(),
+			hasUI: true,
+			settings: Settings.isolated(),
+			getSessionFile: () => null,
+			getSessionSpawns: () => "*",
+			getSessionId: () => sessionManager.getSessionId(),
+			getDeepInterviewAskStage: () => "post-topology",
+		} as ToolSession);
+		const context = {
+			hasUI: true,
+			ui: {
+				select: async (_prompt: string, options: string[]) => options.find(option => option.includes("Timeline")),
+			},
+			abort: () => {},
+		} as unknown as AgentToolContext;
+		await ask.execute(
+			"ordinary-answered-round",
+			{
+				questions: [
+					{
+						id: "goal-clarity",
+						question: "Which outcome does the first release target?",
+						options: [{ label: "Budget" }, { label: "Timeline" }],
+						deepInterview: { round: 6, component: "Scope", dimension: "Goal", ambiguity: 0.58 },
+					},
+				],
+			},
+			undefined,
+			undefined,
+			context,
+		);
+		const state = JSON.parse(
+			await Bun.file(modeStatePath(tempDir.path(), sessionManager.getSessionId(), "deep-interview")).text(),
+		);
+		expect(state.state.rounds).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({ round: 6, question_id: "goal-clarity", selected_options: ["Timeline"] }),
+		]);
+
+		const continued = Promise.withResolvers<void>();
+		const continueSpy = vi.spyOn(session.agent, "continue").mockImplementation(async () => continued.resolve());
+		const assistant = {
+			...createAssistantMessage("Round 6 complete. Ambiguity 58% -> 44%. Next: Constraints."),
+			timestamp: 2,
+		};
+		session.agent.emitExternalEvent({ type: "turn_start" });
+		session.agent.emitExternalEvent({ type: "message_end", message: assistant });
+		session.agent.emitExternalEvent({ type: "agent_end", messages: [assistant] });
+		await continued.promise;
+
+		// The stop gate continued the interview contract: score/persist, then the
+		// next weakest-dimension question via the ask tool.
+		expect(continueSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+		const [reminder] = developerReminders();
+		expect(reminder).toContain("score and persist the answered round");
+		expect(reminder).toContain("use the ask tool for the next question");
+		// The continuation reminder must be the interview contract itself, never a
+		// generic continue/cancel/clear approval surface.
+		expect(reminder).not.toMatch(/continue, or proceed with current clarity/i);
+		expect(reminder).not.toMatch(/ask(?:ing)? to continue/i);
+		// No generic continue/cancel/clear choice surface: the only stop exits the
+		// reminder names are the legitimate terminals (crystallize, handoff, or an
+		// explicit user cancellation), not a mid-interview consent ask.
+		expect(reminder).not.toMatch(/continue\?/i);
+		expect(reminder).not.toMatch(/clear the workflow/i);
+		expect(reminder).not.toMatch(/whether to continue/i);
+	});
 
 	it("atomically commits only two overlapping ordinary-stop reservations", async () => {
 		await activateWorkflow("deep-interview");
diff --git a/packages/coding-agent/test/deep-interview-skill-contract.test.ts b/packages/coding-agent/test/deep-interview-skill-contract.test.ts
index a1ba294e06..c9de67373c 100644
--- a/packages/coding-agent/test/deep-interview-skill-contract.test.ts
+++ b/packages/coding-agent/test/deep-interview-skill-contract.test.ts
@@ -151,13 +151,47 @@ describe("deep-interview ask clarification contract", () => {
 });
 
 describe("deep-interview ouroboros ooo-interview parity port", () => {
-	it("documents the tiered confirmation cadence while keeping the hard cap (feature B)", () => {
-		expect(skill).toMatch(/Tiered Confirmation Cadence/i);
-		expect(skill).toMatch(/Rounds 1-3 \(auto-continue\)/i);
-		expect(skill).toMatch(/Rounds 4-15 \(ask to continue\)/i);
-		expect(skill).toMatch(/Rounds 16\+ \(diminishing-returns warning\)/i);
-		expect(skill).toMatch(/never removes this hard safety cap/i);
+	it("documents the continuation contract: ordinary answered rounds auto-continue without a generic approval ask (issue #4589)", () => {
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/Step 2f: Check Continuation Contract/i);
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/ordinary answered round NEVER asks for generic continuation approval/i);
+		// The regression this pins: the retired tiered cadence asked
+		// "Continue, or proceed with current clarity" after every ordinary round 4-15
+		// (and 16+), turning the ambiguity gate into per-answer consent friction.
+		expect(skill).not.toMatch(/ask to continue/i);
+		expect(skill).not.toMatch(/Continue, or proceed with current clarity/i);
+		expect(skill).not.toMatch(/Rounds 4-15/i);
+		expect(skill).not.toMatch(/diminishing-returns warning/);
+
+		const steps = extractSection(skill, "Steps");
+		const continuationIndex = steps.indexOf("### Step 2f: Check Continuation Contract");
+		expect(continuationIndex).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
+		const continuation = steps.slice(continuationIndex, steps.indexOf("## Phase 3:"));
+		// All four legitimate terminal conditions are documented.
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Threshold \+ closure gates/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/ambiguity ≤ the resolved threshold/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Explicit user exit/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Invocation\/resume suitability ambiguity only/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Bounded continuation safety recovery/);
+		// The resume choice is invocation-boundary-only and never re-asked mid-interview.
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/never re-asked inside an active interview/);
+		// Hard cancellations are never delayed by the pre-round-3 early-proceed guard.
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Hard cancellation/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/stops immediately at any round/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Never turn a hard cancellation into a clarifying question/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Early proceed/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Before round 3, ask one targeted clarifying question/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/do not treat that early-proceed intent as a hard cancellation/);
+		// Passive exit control is preserved with the two intent classes kept distinct.
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/any answer, option, or free-text reply can carry an exit intent/);
+		expect(continuation).toMatch(/Hard cancellations are honored immediately/);
+	});
+
+	it("keeps the hard cap and explicit early-exit controls after retiring the tiered cadence (issue #4589)", () => {
 		expect(skill).toContain("Round 100");
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/Hard cap at 100 rounds/i);
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/Early exit \(round 3\+\)/i);
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/User says "stop", "cancel", "abort"/i);
+		expect(skill).toMatch(/stop immediately, save state for resume/i);
 	});
 
 	it("documents advisory fanout lanes distinct from the milestone panel (feature C)", () => {