Skip to content

NW Review of OSH paper #26

@thin-lizard

Description

@thin-lizard

Following up on our OSH check-in -

  • Here is the draft of the review paper (in google docs)
    • For final steps I think it'll be easiest to move from Google Docs to Microsoft word (submission format is OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document )...but please lmk if you prefer we work out of Overleaf so I know to move the draft there and fix the citations there.
  • We're currently at ~6200 words including citations (limit is 5K including citations) - I think we can easily get there by tightening the discussion and future research sections, and eliminating RQ3 (which we seem to have done already). Our current references list also has a lot of duplicate sources (see note below) which will help.
    • I cut ~200 words in my last pass before filing this issue, I think with even fresher eyes you'll be able to see where we get long-winded.
    • Our 'future research' section is good, but would benefit from your feedback. ST left two bulletpoints for directions we may want to include (we haven't yet bc of the word count). (Rest assured, no other bulletpoints in this draft)
  • Citation-linking got messed up but shouldn't impede your read-thru and revisions - I'll fix it this week. and is fixed.
  • We're inconsistent with quotation marks - this is another tedious but easy fix I'll take care of (based on JOH's style guide).

Please obvi tag me and @sarah114tran with any Qs.
Reminder that we have an overview of the JOH Requirements here: #19

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions