Hi RISE-Video team,
Thanks for releasing the benchmark and evaluation code. I am trying to reproduce the reported results for open-source TI2V models such as Wan2.2-TI2V-5B.
I understand from the README that generated videos should be written into the video_path field, followed by frame extraction and evaluation. However, I could not find the exact video generation settings used for the models in Table 1.
Could you clarify the generation configuration used in your experiments?
In particular:
- video length / number of frames
- fps
- resolution
- sampling steps
- CFG / guidance scale
- sampling solver / shift value
- random seed
- whether prompt enhancement or prompt rewriting was used
- whether one or multiple videos were generated per sample
- whether open-source models used their official default inference settings
For example, for Wan2.2-TI2V-5B, should we use the official default generate.py configuration, or did you use a specific frame_num, resolution, guidance scale, or sampling setup?
This would be very helpful for reproducibility and fair comparison.
Thank you!
Hi RISE-Video team,
Thanks for releasing the benchmark and evaluation code. I am trying to reproduce the reported results for open-source TI2V models such as Wan2.2-TI2V-5B.
I understand from the README that generated videos should be written into the
video_pathfield, followed by frame extraction and evaluation. However, I could not find the exact video generation settings used for the models in Table 1.Could you clarify the generation configuration used in your experiments?
In particular:
For example, for Wan2.2-TI2V-5B, should we use the official default
generate.pyconfiguration, or did you use a specificframe_num, resolution, guidance scale, or sampling setup?This would be very helpful for reproducibility and fair comparison.
Thank you!