Hi — I'm working on OM World, a protocol for a decentralized intent economy. execution-market's framing — Universal Execution Layer with bidirectional AI↔human task marketplace (A2H + H2A) — is the cleanest articulation I've seen of the symmetric agent-human commerce surface.
1. A2H vs H2A protocol symmetry. Are A2H (AI delegates to human) and H2A (human commissions AI) handled by the same protocol surface, or as two distinct flows? Symmetric is cleaner; asymmetric admits real differences (humans need richer task descriptions, AI needs richer constraint envelopes).
2. Gasless x402 settlement model. Gasless x402 implies meta-transactions, paymasters, or relayers. Which model — relayed by the marketplace itself (centralizes liveness), per-call paymaster (decentralized but introduces paymaster trust), or batched relay (cost-amortized)?
3. Task-to-execution-proof binding across directions. A2H proof and H2A proof have different shapes — the human signs off on AI's work differently than AI signs off on human's work. How does the spec normalize, or does it admit a per-direction proof type?
Happy to share OM World's Execution Proof + Mandate. Bidirectional A↔H is the most general execution-market surface — the primitives we are specifying should compose with it, and your design would inform where we leave hooks.
Hi — I'm working on OM World, a protocol for a decentralized intent economy. execution-market's framing — Universal Execution Layer with bidirectional AI↔human task marketplace (A2H + H2A) — is the cleanest articulation I've seen of the symmetric agent-human commerce surface.
1. A2H vs H2A protocol symmetry. Are A2H (AI delegates to human) and H2A (human commissions AI) handled by the same protocol surface, or as two distinct flows? Symmetric is cleaner; asymmetric admits real differences (humans need richer task descriptions, AI needs richer constraint envelopes).
2. Gasless x402 settlement model. Gasless x402 implies meta-transactions, paymasters, or relayers. Which model — relayed by the marketplace itself (centralizes liveness), per-call paymaster (decentralized but introduces paymaster trust), or batched relay (cost-amortized)?
3. Task-to-execution-proof binding across directions. A2H proof and H2A proof have different shapes — the human signs off on AI's work differently than AI signs off on human's work. How does the spec normalize, or does it admit a per-direction proof type?
Happy to share OM World's Execution Proof + Mandate. Bidirectional A↔H is the most general execution-market surface — the primitives we are specifying should compose with it, and your design would inform where we leave hooks.