-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to add grouping rules for other repos #312
Comments
Another example: Netty |
This is already supported but not documented. You can see an example in the FYI, we have been thinking of different approaches where this could partially be inferred, or where it could be defined from code, but both of these approaches seem tricky to implement. |
Is it possible to link to the example? I couldn't see how it is done. I just checked. It seems like the following version is defined 2 times back to back |
@tasomaniac If you remove lines 84-86, the sample seems to work correctly, using the version from |
@joharei Probably a bug, though in future versions, we might have a different behavior as we might stop auto-removing unused entries, just adding a warning/info comment instead. |
I've explained how it works here: |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This project has a really cool feature where you don't have to maintain multiple versions since a library group is known to use the same version for all of its artifacts. Good example is
retrofit2
. All of it's versions will be simply stored inversion.retrofit2
and be shared.Describe the solution you'd like
The same applies to some of group of artifacts too.
refreshVersions
can provide rules functionality to support this. Andversions.properties
will become easier to maintain.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: