Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Bulk update of Local Install SpecialK DLL's #43

Open
zachrd opened this issue Nov 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Bulk update of Local Install SpecialK DLL's #43

zachrd opened this issue Nov 17, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@zachrd
Copy link

zachrd commented Nov 17, 2024

At present it is possible to individually update Local Injection DLL's from the game list. However, when you have a long list of games, it is tedious to recall which games have local installs vs. Global Installs.

An interface, if practical, would fit in the Check For Updates section under Settings.

@Kaldaien
Copy link
Member

https://wiki.special-k.info/en/SpecialK/Tools#special-k-local-updater-sklu

We have that. It would be interesting if this were part of SKIF, but I don't think it's practical now that I am the only developer working on it.

At best, I think indicating to users who use local injection that this tool exists would be a better use of time.

@Aemony
Copy link
Contributor

Aemony commented Nov 19, 2024

To add a bit to this, SKIF and SK both already populates the registry with all relevant local DLL files of newer Special K versions.

The plan was for me to develop an interface in SKIF that would automate the update process of all those DLL files, though I never got around to it before leaving the project.

But the building blocks are all there in SKIF already; they just need to be copied and rearranged in the necessary setup, while adding a setting or two to control per-DLL file behavior (to e.g. allow users to opt out from the update).

(note, I'm not subscribed to this thread so I won't be notified by any replies)

@zachrd
Copy link
Author

zachrd commented Nov 22, 2024

Thanks to you both, for the reply! I'll consider this closed!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants