Feature/matter britzyhub

[KyuminAhn]

Check all that apply

Type of Change

• WWST Certification Request
  • If this is your first time contributing code:
    • I have reviewed the README.md file
    • I have reviewed the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md file
    • I have signed the CLA
  • I plan on entering a WWST Certification Request or have entered a request through the WWST Certification console at developer.smartthings.com
• Bug fix
• New feature
• Refactor

Checklist

• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas
• I have verified my changes by testing with a device or have communicated a plan for testing
• I am adding new behavior, such as adding a sub-driver, and have added and run new unit tests to cover the new behavior

Description of Change

Initial Commit of matter-britzyhub edge driver

Summary of Completed Tests

Tested gas valve
Tested elevator
Tested dimming light

[DongHoon-Ryu]

@KyuminAhn
Hello,
Basically, the EdgeDrivers of individual Bridged Devices under the Bridge do not have to be under the physical Bridge path. This is because the relationship between them is logically established during onboarding.

And, there was no difference between the existing EdgeDriver and the EdgeDriver related to the dimming-light, elevator, gas-valve, etc. you made. If a Bridged Device can operate with the existing Matter Generic EdgeDriver, no separate EdgeDriver code is required. That is, if it can be operated as a Matter Generic EdgeDriver, the EdgeDriver suitable for the Bridged Device is automatically downloaded when the Bridge Device is onboarded without further development.

If you have your own Bridged Device function that cannot be supported by Matter Generic EdgeDriver, you'd better implement the EdgeDriver for the separated directory at this time. However, even in this case, it would be better to implement the function under the directory such as matter-switch or matter-sensor, matter-thermostat, ... depending on the characteristics of the Bridged Device. This is because duplicate code can be minimized.

@hcarter-775 , @nickolas-deboom
Could you check this PR?

[nickolas-deboom]

This may be commented out accidentally