You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 16, 2023. It is now read-only.
Current 0D stenosis models only incorporate pressure drop due to turbulent losses at the stenosis (accounted for using the stenosis coefficient). I am planning to add:
A more comprehensive pressure drop model that will account for viscous losses, inertial effect and a continuous component, in addition to the existing turbulent loss. [Ref below]
Itu, L., Sharma, P., Ralovich, K. et al. Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Coarctation: Validation with In Vivo Measurements. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 669–681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0715-0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Current 0D stenosis models only incorporate pressure drop due to turbulent losses at the stenosis (accounted for using the stenosis coefficient). I am planning to add:
A more comprehensive pressure drop model that will account for viscous losses, inertial effect and a continuous component, in addition to the existing turbulent loss. [Ref below]
Itu, L., Sharma, P., Ralovich, K. et al. Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Aortic Coarctation: Validation with In Vivo Measurements. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 669–681 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0715-0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: