Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to set default filters #499

Open
mpatel514 opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Ability to set default filters #499

mpatel514 opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@mpatel514
Copy link

Feature Request

Problem:
When price checking, the default method is to use min value on item values. When preference is another (max/equals/between) it is tedious to change it for each value for each item.

Potential Solution:
Add a new option in the item trade settings to set the default behaviour for the item value filters to support all options.

@leMicin leMicin added Type: Question Further information is requested Type: Enhancement New feature or request Status: Available Priority: Medium and removed Type: Question Further information is requested labels Jan 27, 2025
@p3gasusxd
Copy link

++ Additional Feature Request
(Similar request so I didn't open a new one)

Problems:

  1. When price checking, the default method is to not have any stats/values selected. When preference is that I'm looking for items with the same stats as mine usually.

  2. Once I've selected my stats/values, the default method is to show ALL the same items with those stats. When preference might be just same items with ONLY those stats.

Potential Solution:

  1. Add an option to have all stats/values selected or have them selected by default.

  2. Add an option to look for items with ONLY the stats/values I have selected or make this default and add an option to show items with additional stats/values

@ClausMueller
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@alfarme
Copy link

alfarme commented Feb 17, 2025

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants