You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just found and started using docker-cache -- thank you!
We encountered an interesting edge case--I was using hashFiles on the Dockerfiles in our repo for the cache key, but our build script creates a new Dockerfile while it runs. Because the key expression is evaluated at runtime when getInput is called, it was returning a different key at the beginning of execution (loading from the cache) vs the end of execution (saving to the cache). This made it essentially impossible for us to ever have a cache hit.
As a workaround, I added a step to manually hash the files and generate a key beforehand, but I think the "expected" behavior for this tool would be to inherently use the same key for load & save, regardless of whether the conditions used to create the key change.
I just found and started using docker-cache -- thank you!
We encountered an interesting edge case--I was using
hashFiles
on the Dockerfiles in our repo for the cache key, but our build script creates a new Dockerfile while it runs. Because the key expression is evaluated at runtime whengetInput
is called, it was returning a different key at the beginning of execution (loading from the cache) vs the end of execution (saving to the cache). This made it essentially impossible for us to ever have a cache hit.As a workaround, I added a step to manually hash the files and generate a key beforehand, but I think the "expected" behavior for this tool would be to inherently use the same key for load & save, regardless of whether the conditions used to create the key change.
Code Examples
If the subsequent steps create a new Dockerfile, the
Post Cache Docker Images
step will generate a new key and save the file to a new cache entry.The workaround:
Here, the key is generated once and used in both the initial and post steps.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: