You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Chapter 3, at the very beginning, states that we can use Monte-Carlo method to compute area of a circle with radius 1.
Chapter 3.1 tries to expound on that, but does it in a somewhat haphazard way. There are several proofs that tie the expected value to the Monte-Carlo method and the area under the curve (AUC), but there is no clear explanation as to why we need the expected value and how it all ties together.
My understanding of the chapter is this:
What we are trying to say is that we can use Monte-Carlo method to compute AUC of an arbitrary function using the expected value.
First, we can estimate the expected value of a function using Monte-Carlo method:
$$ E[f(x') | a \leq x' \leq b] \approx \frac 1 N \sum_{i=0}^{N-1} f(x_i) $$
Chapter 3, at the very beginning, states that we can use Monte-Carlo method to compute area of a circle with radius 1.
Chapter 3.1 tries to expound on that, but does it in a somewhat haphazard way. There are several proofs that tie the expected value to the Monte-Carlo method and the area under the curve (AUC), but there is no clear explanation as to why we need the expected value and how it all ties together.
My understanding of the chapter is this:
What we are trying to say is that we can use Monte-Carlo method to compute AUC of an arbitrary function using the expected value.
First, we can estimate the expected value of a function using Monte-Carlo method:
At the same time, we've proven that:
And, since we know that:
we can use Monte-Carlo method to estimate AUC of an arbitrary function$f$ :
QED
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: