Git workflow #452
maurolepore
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This repo helped me try the Gitflow workflow and finally learn a way to work more or less fluently with it (see post). That fluid way used the
git flow
extension, which does merges locally. (For example,git flow release finish 0.2.0
mergesrelease/0.2.0
intomaster
anddevelop
, then removesrelease/0.2.0
.) I welcome that automation because it minimizes the things I need to remember to do manually.Unfortunately the current settings of this repo does not allow us to merge
master
locally then push toorigin
. Worse, we need two reviewers. This slows the workflow -- for example, the latest version of this package has been available on CRAN for 2 weeks now, yet the PR merging the release branch intomaster
is still pending review.This makes me think of two ways to remove the frictions:
git flow
extension -- i.e. allow a local merge followed by a push, and do not require reviews to merge into master -- as that is a formality (the real release is on CRAN).Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions