Describe the issue
Some examples (e.g. 2 wavelength Texeira fit) using real water data show little improvement upon refinement. Although these examples are probably working correctly, it may appear to a user that something is wrong. While it is definitely a good idea to have a fit to some real data, it would be preferable to have an example where the improvement is more evident. Potentially this could be achieved by restricting the Q/E ranges of the fitting.
In addition, shouldn't the Texeria model be expected to provide a reasonable fit the water data? Do we know why this isn't the case here?
Screenshots
For example, the 2 wavelength Texeira fit only improves from a chis squared of 5235 to 4305, which is almost imperceptible graphically:
Before fitting
After fitting
Describe the issue
Some examples (e.g. 2 wavelength Texeira fit) using real water data show little improvement upon refinement. Although these examples are probably working correctly, it may appear to a user that something is wrong. While it is definitely a good idea to have a fit to some real data, it would be preferable to have an example where the improvement is more evident. Potentially this could be achieved by restricting the Q/E ranges of the fitting.
In addition, shouldn't the Texeria model be expected to provide a reasonable fit the water data? Do we know why this isn't the case here?
Screenshots
For example, the 2 wavelength Texeira fit only improves from a chis squared of 5235 to 4305, which is almost imperceptible graphically:
Before fitting
After fitting
