Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring back accessibility options from older gui #42

Open
Altify-Development opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 6 comments
Open

Bring back accessibility options from older gui #42

Altify-Development opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@Altify-Development
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the previous version of this script, there was an option to display the tiles via colors instead of using the arrows, and I created an image searching PoC that would use the tile color modification method to automatically select the correct tiles in coordination to properly move them as fast as 12ms.

Describe the solution you'd like
Add a option to replace arrows with shading like before under the appearance settings.

Additional context
If you would like additional information about the request or pictures of the PoC and an in depth explanation on how it worked. You can reach me at my email below

[email protected]

@Hakorr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hakorr commented Feb 4, 2025

Good idea, could bring it back!

@trashpro7
Copy link

trashpro7 commented Feb 4, 2025

It would be interesting if it were possible to change the color of the piece (by default white - and I mean color of the piece, not the square the piece is in) to another color, and then a different color for the square where the piece should be moved.

This would make it possible to create color-based aimbot python scripts, which would click on a tile with a color of 1, and move it to a square with a color of 2. This would eliminate the need for complex libraries like python-chess, opencv, etc. to recognize pieces or the state of the board.

This would make it possible to create an easy, external (not detectable) auto-move script where one could configure: a random time range for the move, for example from 0.1 to 0.4s, or a "human mode" where the mouse does not click in the very center of the piece, but rather orbits it, a little to the right or a little to the left, up/down randomly, and shakes when moving it, to simulate human mouse movement.

@Hakorr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hakorr commented Feb 4, 2025

This would make it possible to create an easy, external (not detectable)

Not sure how undetectable it'd be considering it would require the page's elements to be modified.

@trashpro7
Copy link

This would make it possible to create an easy, external (not detectable)

Not sure how undetectable it'd be considering it would require the page's elements to be modified.

So changing the color of the piece would modify the page element, but changing the color of the square would not? Hmm.. let me find out

I realized that hovering the mouse around the piece already activates the "little hand" click, so just changing the color of the square would be enough. However, the color of the piece's square and the color of the square in which the piece must be moved would need to be different.

@Hakorr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hakorr commented Feb 4, 2025

but changing the color of the square would not

It would not be that bad as A.C.A.S would only display an overlay and modify the elements it created. Obviously that is still injected to the site which is detectable.

@Hakorr
Copy link
Collaborator

Hakorr commented Feb 4, 2025

I realized that hovering the mouse around the piece already activates the "little hand" click, so just changing the color of the square would be enough. However, the color of the piece's square and the color of the square in which the piece must be moved would need to be different.

Along with this update, I could include a setting to make the whole square flash in certain color, that should be sufficient.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants