Skip to content

Some questions about MI-GAN #7

@Jerry-GX

Description

@Jerry-GX

MI-GAN is a great job, thank you for open source! I would like to ask a few questions:

  1. What are your reasons for not using a loss function like L1? Will using this pixel-by-pixel supervised loss affect the final result?
  2. The current image resolution on the mobile devices is relatively high, and the model can only handle low-resolution images, such as 512, and the result is blurry. Is there any better solution?
  3. The default parameter for model re-parameterization in the code is 4, but the parameter mentioned in the paper is 8. Which number is more appropriate?
    Apologies for the disturbance, and I am looking forward to your response. Thank you very much!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions