Github Action for quarto notebook

[AritraDey-Dev]

Description

Once Run workflow from pecan.xml #3531 is merged,write a gh action for this quarto notebook.

[allgandalf]

what's the status on this issue?

[AritraDey-Dev]

Github action for quarto notebook is already implemented for DEMO 1 Notebook here in this PR #3577.

Once the uncertainty notebook i.e. PR #3570 is done we can merge the gh action PR #3638. After that this issue will be resolved.

[mdietze]

Are you implying that successful GHA for Demo 2 should be a requirement for all PRs? Given the larger computational cost of Demo 2, and the relatively small number of additional functions involved, does this make sense to be required?

[AritraDey-Dev]

Are you implying that successful GHA for Demo 2 should be a requirement for all PRs?

Since any change in the uncertainty package or other relevant packages could affect the Demo 2 workflow, keeping this check seems important. Also, as the Demo 1 CI already validates the existing part of demo 2 workflow, I believe we can remove the CI for Demo 1 and keep only the Demo 2 CI, as it effectively validates both Demo 1 and Demo 2 in a single workflow.

I’ve set the ensemble number to 10 for the analysis, so I’m not sure if that would lead to higher computational costs in this case.