Skip to content

bug: docs reference nonexistent workflow names and outdated branch/version state #79

Description

@Panacota96

Summary

Core documentation still references a nonexistent claude-code-review.yml, describes dev as the default branch, and shows stale version metadata.

Evidence

  • README.md:14 still shows version 1.2.4.
  • VERSION and CHANGELOG.md disagree on the current release.
  • README.md, CLAUDE.md, documentation/ARCHITECTURE.md, and documentation/operator/CICD.md reference claude-code-review.yml, but the repo contains .github/workflows/code-review.yml.
  • documentation/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md still describes dev as the default development branch.

Impact

  • Contributors and operators get incorrect workflow and branch guidance.
  • Release/version state is ambiguous.

Expected outcome

Normalize workflow references, branch model documentation, and version metadata across README, docs, and supporting files.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions