You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
add tracking code to maintain, for each trait, the total set of caller-checked effects and unsafety for that trait (in the current package scope, among all implementations)
add information to our audit/policy files: in addition to the public functions, we also need the traits (both implemented by and exposed by/declared by that crate). For each trait: whether caller-checked or unsafe, which specific caller-checked effects
In the call graph in scanner, make sure trait methods are added to the call graph
In the call graph in scanner, make sure name resolution for traits points to the abstract trait as added to the call graph.
Possibly for v0, or save for v1:
In the call graph in scanner, add specific trait implementations in addition to the abstract trait method
In a non-generic context when we know the trait that is pointed to, point to the specific trait implementation instead of the abstract trait method.
For dynamic trait objects, just point to the abstract trait method
For v1:
For dynamic trait objects, track which specific possible trait impls it could point to
For traits called in a generic context, track which specific possible trait impls it could point to
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
New roadmap for traits. Replaces #30
For v0:
Possibly for v0, or save for v1:
For v1:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: